Member Info for Wolster

Just think 15p - I couldve been sitting at home drinking ****tails in the garden for months stress free (assuming I sold then)

vs

Sitting in the garden for months drinking ****tails (granted craping myself incase of no nomad)

So thats it then - it all boils down to 2 view points

TDT + others = MT 18,000oz = 7.2p very frothy

The rest = MT 4,000,000oz + Flank MT 15,000,000oz = MT 19,000,000oz = 7.2p very unfrothy + a side dish of MT 21,000,000 in the local area.

Its quite easy to see why the arguments can not be resolved on this site with those poles apart statements.

Even TDT doesnt really think their is only 18,000oz down their, as the drill samples wouldn't be worth **** - EUA woulve moved on years ago - however no one can be certain of the 40m oz either, but fortunatly at 7.2p there is alot of upword wiggle room on the price to keep us all happy I am certain.

With the unpopular back up plan of digging in & finding it ourselves (& yes taking the initial SP drop)

All sounds reasonable Spikeyj but with one glaring ommission - what if MT is sold ?

Thats the what if senario all those Pi's (& myself) have invested in (ok a minor few have gone in for MT to production - but I doubt thats alot) - & given the BOD's stated intention, we arnt just investing on a whim.

Therefore there is every chance that a frothy 7.2p is grossly undervalued if a sale comes off.

If it doesnt ofc a pullback is likely.

"to mop up any sellers wanting to cash in after 3 months of needless worry"

All my needless worries have gone, since the Nomad signed - I can hold for months now np.

Let me guess, before it bagged, it had an exploration phase as well (much like EUA)

During the exploration phase I presume it didn't fully know it had found "El Dorado" only after extensive testing & digging, we all have beginings & we all invested in EUA looking for the next big thing.

What we perhaps are even more fortunate with is a decent BOD to go with it.

"Expect more - as the shorters own fear deepens so will the frequency of new and bizarre theories designed to spread fear, uncertainty and doubt amongst genuine investors."

I think most of us have been invested since the bear attack down to 2p & now post the de-list fear - there is no scared left, its probably the most bullet proof bunch of investors you could have, shorters will have a hard job imo.

If its a company sale, then usually any cash offer pegs the SP (minus 1%/2% etc).

On an asset sale etc.. its the special divy folk are after, or at least the value of the spaecial divy added to the SP that will peg the SP, tho less reliable a guide than a full sale.

Just incase im being thick - there is no way you can bed & breakfast whilst suspended is there (Hargreaves Lansdown) it seems unlikely, but was wondering.

Yeah I need to bed & breakfast for the current year, ive still got 40k worth of these in my trading account - exposed to all sorts of tax (I imagine that'll be my job number one upon relist)

Gotta say given the governments covid spends I wonder how safe my SIPP investment is as well, i'd imagine the 25% tax free withdrawal will come under threat soon.

I'll go 22.5p & i become a millionaire - will deduct the price of a new Civic type R, (which first set of tyres will be used to donut the work car park), & a street sign outside my workplace with my happy face on it.

All i can say is thank f***.

Good job positive posters, ill take my panicky, crapping myself hat off now & return to normal activites (P.S lesson learned tho - ill never invest 100% in any stock again - that was just to stressfull - even if it does pay out in the end ive prolly lost 2 years of good living + the last 3 months from stress alone :)

Request permission to reboard the Dabloon Galleon I seem to have regained my sea legs.

In fairness as much as I am in the panicky crew - as I'm overexposed (given the suspension has prevented me re-adjusting to Covid/Nomad etc..) as long as the Nomad issue is resolved - im happy with my investment (therefore i'd only sell a little to give me Covid cash headroom) the rest is longterm & happy to play for the endgame.

Not to mention a massive vote of confidence if a Nomad is signed, would prevent me from dumping.

Carnt fault your take (granted im in the panicky crew atm)

'But the company does not have to end the suspension until the nomad does sign up'

Why does the company have to end suspension on new signing of the nomad.

Is that saying that the old reason for the suspension - the Hammond tweet - has been fully cleared up ?

Some of us are screaming in our nightmares, whilst most of this BB try & tell us there there it wont happen.

I just wanna wake up now & hope its all gone away - without taking my life savings with it.

"They will want to sell to retire"

Its this that worries me in the current 'Nomad' situation. (prior to the nomad issue I saw it as a positive)

But now all i see is more risk - re if they retire they wont care as much for future AIM benifits - it'll all be about maximising their personal stakes, which if private maybe easier to do ?

Exactly.

Like ohh the nomad has resigned - i'll de-risk a little till im comfortable - oohh **** we are still suspended since some twat gobbed off on twitter.

Or

Oohh that covid looks a little rough - np i'll d-risk a little till im comfortable - oohh **** we are still suspended since some twat gobbed off on twitter.

Or

Oohh the BOD said we would have a Nomad near the 29th April, but dont appear to have signed one - np i'll d-risk a little till im comfortable - oohh **** we are still suspended since some twat gobbed off on twitter.

How can anyone say take responsibility for our trading when the darn BOD have stripped it from us for months. Damn well critical months at that for the world never mind EUA.

OFC im feckin worried, im a normal person.

Hope your right, but honestly not many who invested would have expected this 11th hour boom or bust senario, & fear always trumps greed, therefore I think its totally understandable.

None of us mind a stock that goes up & down we all take on those risks - but what we have here is outside of normal expected BOD behaviour in any book.

Should this de-list, anyone know what happens to Lisa's, Isa investments drop down to just plain stocks & shares (no protection tax shield etc..) but Lisa where you arnt supposed to do withdrawals before either retirement age or first house purchase - could this leave me vulnerable to have to repay the government contributions ?

Possibly not, thats why most are all ****ting ourselves.

Will mess up our ISA's, Lisa's right off the bat, not to mention sending the whole lot into a black hole of no information & god knows what. Utter carnage. Life savings possibly wiped.

Not at all the risk profile I thought I was dealing with, when I invested.

If I may, the advfn site posters were informing there BB at about the time of suspension that our Nomad had resigned & whilst the usual uproar was targeted at such negativity - it pans out to be true.

So whilst we have not been informed of the actual resignation date, im inclined to believe the advfn posters who raise this issue way back in Feb.

TBH I dont want to post here anymore or even think about how bad this may turn out, im having dark thoughts about a one way ticket to Russia & an Ak. So far from the giddy day's around the 10 Feb, my head is a cabbage now. - Cheers EUA BOD.