Member Info for Wimbledon

The company has already been charged with a string of criminal negligence offences, over some of the largest environmental spills in Finnish history. Now, HS reports that police and Finland’s financial regulator are investigating whether the company failed to report its production difficulties quickly enough to shareholders. HS says police have so far questioned Talvivaara’s board chair, Tapani Järvinen, and its CEO Pekka Perä, as well as its former Chief Financial Officer Saila Miettinen-Lähde over whether they tried to hide the scale of the firm’s problems from the markets between 2011 and 2013. Meanwhile the paper also reports that Talvivaara’s creditors and shareholders have expressed openness to the prospect of the firm entering into a debt restructuring process, as an alternative to bankruptcy. The company’s largest shareholder is the Finnish state, which owns 15% of the company through its investment arm Solidium.

i wish we could voice our disgust to somebody in finland about this . the PM may be

txs for the update much appreciated

Bl@@dy hell wrong board again sorry folks

Savaloy .. Womble here sorry not been around today's going to be difficult for me to post over next few days but don't want you to start thinking I've sold out ha ha . S@@t sp great company that's my words of wisdom for today still it won't be for ever there will come a time that the sp will be left to its own devices. What a great year this will be and we must be getting some more news soon never mind the rcpp updates which IMO are just going to become more and more astounding as things develop.

hi i know you want to remain positive here but my contact at nordnet thinks there is no value left in the company and he is an Equity analyst.. but hey he could be wrong.. the Govt has 15 % and Audley the rest and the 250m was toward running the mine and not the actual payment for the business that bit we dont know.... at least that how i see it.

Wrong board crikey I post more erroneous ones than not apologies

No I haven't sold just been to the dentist.. Well my initial thoughts are that I want to punch lc right in the belly but will give him until Friday to calm me downed I'm not a violent man . JD wag has summed this up its all happened before with the market in the know and lc has clearly stated how she didn't want to dilute shareholders and then this . There has to be a very very good reason for this including the timing and as Andy says let's hope it's hero to zero to hero again as I do think the week is far from over. What we don't want is bad karma and the sp slipping back to pre jv signing news as that would be sick beyond sick. Shorters beware lc MUST have something else up his sleeve as for gods sake we have just announced a truly monster deal and this placing was pretty small in the grand scheme of things

agreed you would think not

have asked our contact at nordnet to let all of his contacts know how p--ed off we all are with whats happened here and that we will be writing to our local MP's due to the finnish govt involvement in talv

this is the key here IMO if bond debt holders convert to equity then there will be dilution but we will still have some shs in the new company even though they could have a virtually zero with to begin with but at least everyone gets something if the bond holders dont then they will end up with nothing anyway as the co will go bankrupt what I dont know is how much audley have paid or are willing to pay for talv which in my book STINKS. The govt cannot be responsible for private investment in theory but in this instance I think this STINKS and the govt should be ensuring that us existing investors are NOT left with nothing and at least are given some shs in the new company. this in my book could be a very bad reflection on FInland especially for overseas investors and surely no private investors would be willing to reinvest ion the NEW TALV going forward.

wrong board sorry AGAIN

A follow-up RNS regarding Haneti.. indeed as i said earlier more news due very soon . momentum now is key

well thats what the re org was all about with bond debt being exahgnes for equity but the problem is will be any value in the company at all ! im very confused

i was reading about mandatum at the weekend but didnt really understand quite what it all means can someone summarise please

What a c@@k

Indeed if you could see my portfolio you would understand why humour is important to me ( kibo being the exception ) Well that makes perfect sense on both counts mate and you know I appreciate your thoughts cheers and here's to a very interesting year

Yes a no vote would mean it's over I have been reading some articles that are beginning to get critical if the govt potentially being involved again if current shareholders are wiped out . Too right one of the main reasons I stuck by this was their involvement in the first place and there would be an obvious negative impact of future investment and I would certainly be the first to tell folks to stay away from any new company

the form is on the website so i guess its the one however i have contacted my broker urgently as their corporate actions deptr should take care of it. DONT FORGET TO VOTE FOR AND NOT AGAINST OTHERWISE ITS GAME OVER

http://www.talvivaara.com/files/talvivaara/Saneeraus_aanestys/____nestyslausuma%20FIN-ENG%20%285259367_1%29.pdf