The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
The gall of the man
'....the take-up under the offer has exceeded internal projections.....'
well there were a lot on here who did not know what your internal projections were and were spouting all sorts
did he get what he wanted?
enough to pay his salary and biscuits for a few more years
wjmflp
My earned funds are gone.
What I had I now have not.
Whereas those that had not now have (mine).
However you wish to dress this company it is the BoD's
and not ours
This was always the case
It matters not how this share does in the future DW has seen the most remarkable destruction of pi wealth possible
from the 'shut in' to the 'let' sbuy as much acreage as we can...'
to 'let's g vertical...' to 'let's have a right's issue...' and so on to billllllllllions of shares...' and forever onwards.
The most galling point waas '... I am not a wealthy man....'
How about those that trusted you?
DW = Jam
wjmflp and proud to have an opinion of the Bod as above
Buy for a 1p sell for a £1 - really
Started a bit early - jumped the gun
Wait for the herd who want this to rise quickly into a sell off.
Really
Brom
You gotta be kidding me entertaining a post like that.
Someone who purports not to know the difference between Bid/Offer/sp and you want him/her to consult their financial advisor
Really
Gone down a few levels/staircases in my book
wjmflp
Cjml
I am not entirely sure to be honest but my information was noon today.
I do not need or require any apology as you may be correct but in any case I am tired of the bi-polar postings.
There was a time earlier when this BB was about sharing information (garrym and others).
Now it's a cesspit of extreme views.
Tiresome
wjmflp
Mr Martini
I suppose I have just got old and grumpy with my lot (shares).
They had those sort of figures before the RI.
My issue is that I have been in a couple of shares (oil) that have done similar with disastrous outcomes (loads of oil supposedly in the ground) which came to nothing.
I also had shares in RMP (our partner) which did even worse while I was holding them
So anyone who thinks I am not a holder - just check how positive I was in my earlier post.
Now just old and grumpy as I said.
I really want this to do well and I will sell and move on.
wjmflp
If the news is so good why not RI afterwards and not before
Seems to me the ANN is timed to help the take up
Just MO
wjmflp
And how is this done ? you may ask.
Positive proof of a statement of holdings for the actual share (such as those used above 3% now) with any other sensitive info blacked out but leaving name and a copy of drivers licence or other official document such as PP .
No cheating now
wjmflp
You have to prove your holding band and get awarded your rating - Next time try reading and understanding the post.
The whole point is to ensure transparency of '...I hold x...'
lol
wjmflp
If a qualification of being a poster was that you had to PROVE to lse the bandwidth of your holding in order to post on any sgare
i.e.
A = 0-1000
B = 1000 to 10000
C = 10000 to 50,000
D = 50,000 to 100,000
E = 100,000 to 500,000
F = 500,000 to 1M
G = above 1M
All post to have a box containing bandwidth monicker which changes with shareholding patterm
Would stop the stupid posters on any BB and allow the BB to see motives (which I think would stop) and allow all BB's to be somewhat civil and transparent
Perhaps I should start one.
I am going to post this on 88e as that is a vipers nest at the moment
wjmflp
The rampathon can start any time they like and probably will to get it moving asap
wjmflp
Because IMO there will be a rampathon to get the sp up and then a significant amount of the 14% will be sold in to the rise and so we go down again until this settles before news (if there is any).
Otherwise we go below 1p again.
Disgruntled and NO I did not take mine up and anyone who wants them can have them
wjmflp
Ta
Just re-read and seen.
A bit of a double entendre as 1st para says 'entered' which IMO means signed.
Only other way is that it was a Framework contract which can cover/includes Sea Lion under which 'if/when' SL gets approved the Framework provider will not face competition.
All IMO
wjmflp
wjmflp
Carroreater,
Can you please point me to where you are reading the '...subject to...' element of your post as all I can see is:
Quote:
' ...has entered into a contract...' which to me means there is a contract signed by both parties.
Ready to be confused again if you nwould kindly point me to where you are quoting from
wjmflp
mcivorv
The % is in the direction of travel and semantics
1. How much more than 1p would one have to pay to get the share at 1.15
answer 15%
2. What is the discount when purchasing a 1.15p share for 1p
your answer
Whatever direction you have to pay 0.15p more if you purchase at sp of 1.15 rather than 1p
wjmflp
Are you still trying to peddle last seasons jam cjml or pounding the drum for the rights issue to disgruntled PI's
wjmflp
topof
You put a big IF in
The theory is that the price hovers at or just below 1p
The theory also works on the theory that PI's are so demoralised by the rights issue that they do not put any more money in at all - even if the sp falls to the so called heavy resistance line of LEFKOSIA.
I will not be putting another penny in and others have indicated in their posts that they will not be either
wjmflp
Lets issue an RNS for a rights issue at a supposed 14% benefit to the shareholders.
The price falls to 1p (or less) so very few/no-one takes it up
Our friends take up the balance
A little while later we give some good news and everyone makes some money (except the shareholders)
Then lets do it over again
Interesting theory
wjmflp
Problem is Harry, the parallels keep coming
wjmflp
Problem is Harry, the paralles keep coming
wjmflp