Member Info for WeTookPelham

Oh dear...not the response you were hoping for CB.

ChickenBee! You clearly have little else to do but post on 2 x forums & twitter all day, so why won't you answer my fair (IMO) questions?

Aww shucks....thanks.

Are you going to shy away from the questions then?

ChickenBee! You're back! How's the solicitor hunt coming along?

Joking* aside, please can you clear up some things for us, seeing as your being so open atm:

1. Are you a former employee? Yes or no?

2. What did you mean by "if they had listened to me 2 years ago" etc?

3. You clearly have a line of comms with Heather Shaw, what's your relationship please?

4. Are you being paid to post? (See Q.6)

5. What is your current area of work? Roughly speaking, e.g. finance//investing or still science?

6. Is posting on the forums your main hobby? Serious question.

You're clearly a former investor but now a very very very disgruntled former investor.

You clearly disagree with how the data has been presented/trial protocol...So why haven't you spoken to Scancell directly? Why havent you spoken to the relevant bodies? Surely they should be informed if you think fraud has taken place?

This is a share/investor forum, by posting on an share investor forum you're only objective can be to "try" and affect the price (which hasn't happened btw), why are you not posting on medical forums/oncology/medical trial forums instead?

(*not joking)

""If they listened to me 2 years ago and only focused on scib1....""

Wow! I read their comment at the time, I didn't think much of it if I'm honest. But yes it reads like a former employee doesn't it?

Also the vitriolic hate for Lindy Durrant was also very weird and very personal IMO. I believe they also accused Bermuda of working for Vulpes and many other strange comments I can't remember off the top of my head. It wasn't the normal/classic de-ramping IMO.

"If they are just investors - then why would the poster expect to be listened to, when it comes to the company strategy going foreword-no one would seriously expect the company to change directions of travel just because a certain PI contacted them, with a different strategy - i think is generally accepted that they ( Scancell) are the experts ."

Whilst being paid to de-ramp makes more sense and is probably more likely(?), like you've mentioned those comments and vitriol do seem very weirdly specific.

If they are a former employee they are in even deeper doo-doo than they were already.

Interestingly they've gone quiet over there too around the same time this former employee comment was made. Someone over there should just ask them outright if they were.

P.s. You lot should set up a detective agency!

Now there's a thought!

Moon party, would you mind posting your post over there to over here too. Some excellent points RE our recent Scancell hating poster. Your points does make it sound more and more like a concerted, organised effort. They are still posting non stop over there. Where do people find the time unless they are paid to do so?

The crypto wailer and 🐓🐝 have been mocking our comments on here so only felt right to mock them back. But I shall try and refrain and not stoop to their level.

😂

Speaking of partnering, co-development etc...as mentioned by others it would be pretty silly for Genmab not take up Glymab Therapeutics.

"Genmab has plucked another anti-glycan antibody from Scancell’s shelves in a deal worth up to $630 million. The license agreement comes about two years after Genmab snagged its first antibody from Scancell for up to $624M, and it brings Genmab's potential tab to a hefty $1.27 billion."

https://www.fiercebiotech.com/biotech/genmab-buys-second-anti-glycan-antibody-scancell-bringing-total-tab-over-1-billion

For some reason I only the $600m figure in my head.

Thanks for that CW. This is the key bit for me personally.

"...So partnering and co-development are clear opportunities for us, and we have the cash runway to explore those and to really drive and assess what's best for the future development of the iSCIB1+. It is clear that if we consider and we decide that future financing is what we need to push this forward, that's something that we will consider, but we have time and we have the data to explore what's right with shareholder value in mind."

Funny you should mention paymasters Moon party. Because I can't work out how they would find the time/make all that effort (2 x forums all day, twitter possibly other outlets?) And even if you were unemployed/retired (they don't appear to be) you'd had have better things to do! IMO.

"...Regarding fraud I only said "could be" and "borderline" "

Except you didn't 😉

Don't worry ChickenBee, screenshots taken, including your comments on the Jacob Plieth Twitter post.

Tick tock.

Https://www.pinsentmasons.com/out-law/news/uk-company-sues-own-shareholders-for-internet-defamation

Found a good solicitor yet?

How are you going to spout your garbage if most people have to you on filter now? 🤡

P.s. hope you've been using a VPN

Tick tock.

Https://firstwordpharma.com/story/5982761

Bhudda bob, was thinking the same hence have been taking screenshots.

Darkprince - The irony of your last post, lovely.

But as I was saying, forum members just need to click on your name to see your posting history. You always seem to pop up at opportune moments too IMO. And jumping very deliberately on Scinv_trumps misdirection, well...To be expected I guess.

RW - Moderators are going to be busy tomorrow, that's for sure 😉