Member Info for Wellersworld

HogBog that seem pretty achievable, Gl with that.

Been in this a long time, about where I first got in, have averaged down though. Always liked the project, if it does what it says on the tin, got to be a huge market.

I down tenfold on this, haven’t sold as I liked the concept, and the company really seemed to be getting it act together at one point, also US grants.

To sell and take massive loss, recoup pennies on the pounds or just leave it, consider total loss and keep it as a wild card.

Seems like a good post but, when was this posted? No context otherwise

If so might leave door open different reagents/ different tests. Interesting

Deffo has a Groundhog Day feeling 🤣

Larger trade today, crossing trade apparently. Just wondering if this is a n exchange, but it shows as as sell? Also I read this is a close of market trade, does it have ramifications when the market opens?

Probably a year ago there were a few posters on here that had some thought out price targets. Seems like we’re further forward, though share price is backwards 🤣. Any more astute people on here with ideas?

Do you think if you were a serious Vcapital firm, you’d make a play for a company reliant on a product by the parent group, seems to me the only sensible thing would be to aim for both. Never expected anything quick, but the fundamentals of the product seem good, long periods with little news/ progress. I guess that’s the Norm for a biotech

You’re a bit hostile man

Pretty sure I bought it, must have lost it down the back of the sofa. 🤔

I get people have done a lot of technical analysis, and there’s concern about competition, especially where there’s a NHS connection but, isnt a test for lung cancer such as CIZ is purported to be, made for the US market. I mean it’s the pretty much the spiritual home of smoking, not even much drive to reduce it. Also the way the health insurance industry is set up there, ‘pre’ ill -Health (ie. Routine) screening in the US makes a lot of sense, massive market.

If I was an insurer moral arguments aside, I’d be clamouring for a test that does what Ciz should do. I would have thought US market would dwarf NHS. Just putting a thought out there?

Was looking at this, seems to to not necessarily be a rival, more complementary. Say an early diagnosis via Ciz, follow up with QuicDna, to genetic identify the type, and targeted treatment.

“With the new QuicDNA program, patients will get a blood sample for ctDNA early in the diagnostic pathway when the lung physician suspects stage III or IV lung cancer. The genomic results will be available for the MDT meeting. Because more than 10 genetic biomarkers are associated with an approved therapy for lung cancer, genetic testing can significantly increase treatment options. “When you can identify, for example, an EGFR mutation through sequencing, a patient can potentially start oral therapy (tablets) the next day,” says Meissner.”

https://emea.illumina.com/company/news-center/feature-articles/a-liquid-biopsy-study-offers-new-hope-for-lung-cancer-patients.html

What’s these stupid 15 years olds messages-blocked

Sky news this morning, lung cancer vaccine development, strikes me as complimentary to CIZ?

Early stage detection key, and importantly post vaccine assessment of outcomes. Still in lab development stages by francis crick/ UCL

Thoughts?

I like this board often useful info, and a variety of opinions. I am deffo a novice and find the majority of posts helpful. I wouldn’t take a word on here as gospel, nor blame anyone else. You pay your money a take your chances! I

still confident in the science, good results so far, funded for 12m. huge potential market.

I’ll be looking to increase holdings at this price point. I find it hard to get my head around the valuations people put forward, on here but If it gets back to IPO. I’m m in profit, and hopefully beyond. GLA.

30p would be good for me, think it’s got more in it (if successful) though?

Lot of talk about research grants, this is a research project isn’t it. It’s a new product with potential to save lives, lots of them. I’m pretty sure if you spent many years of your life researching something you’d want it to: A work (save lives) B be financially rewarding. These things take time, better to get it right than present something mediocre, or ineffective. I’m down %35 but would buy in again if I had spare cash. it’s a speculative play, so risky, but we’re in at the ground floor right, massive potential. Anyone have any thoughts on a long term SP, I know a few were bandied about before?

Man if I complained at every loss, I’d be here till the cows come home to roost! Pretty much down on everything, including this. Not everything but must -20% across the board, trying to consider it a positive, it’s like the time to build a stake

Great use of the word chump, total 80s throw back 🤣

Yawn