Member Info for Warthog4

"We’ve rerated to between 6-7p."
Not now we ain't!! Started off at just short of 6p this am. Now 5.6p and falling.All the good news is there but still these sodding mm's p..s about with the sp on a daily basis presumably to allow their mates to keep buying in at bargain prices.. Now down 39% from the August high-not funny.

......thanks for your reassuring words. I am aware that Covid has always been a side play BUT the MM's don't seem to grasp that fact, hence my comments last evening.
GLA

Mmm. reading between the lines it seems to me that the euphoria surrounding the possible efficacy of1801 vis a vis Covid
is beginning to wane and we are back to relying solely upon its use in other areas.

Would I be premature in advancing the theory that this may have a neg. impact on our SP/future prospects or are we in a different league perhaps?

"The Merck pill seems a bit of a damp squib...."
Shouldn't that be Bristol Myers?? Y'know Bristol Myers Squib!!
Oh! suit yourselves (as Francis Howerd used to say)
Bit of levity for a change

HL would reply that the data on their website is provided by a third party. It is bad-some of the SP's/daily movement figures they display are absolutely misleading rubbish.
Time to change their provider methinks

elcap
"So in short they are not earning massive salaries."
£150k is sure as hell massive to me sunshine, but I suppose when you compare it to the obscene sums paid to a bunch of neanderthals kicking a bag of wind round a field, then it sure a hell ain't!!

Previous RNS's cover this subject.
In rough terms the value of the Options exercised is bout a year's salary for each of them.

"What if they had done this when the sp was at 9p?" Folk would probably have congratulated them but when they do it after the SP fallen 13% in 48 hours and just after another "jam tomorrow" presentation the MM's begins to wonder, being the suspicious little frackers that they are.

".....as a key part of the Company's long-term incentive scheme to retain key talent in the business."
So, how about an incentive to keep us LTH's interested in the business?????????????

Correction 6.5%-getting ridiculous

Spot on Groverlad. This share has always been jam tomorrow but as a LTH what can one do but hang on. However at some stage one has to cook up an exit strategy ie take your profits and run but if the company then hits paydirt and the shares go through the roof????
"That's life-that's what all the people say"

Correction-5%.Even bigger joke-must be because Mutley has recommended the share.

Brokers AND shareholders?? Surely some conflict of interest there?
Any road up usual manufactured sp depression this morning-buys outweigh sells 2:1 but SP down 3%-joke.

Why isn't it PFC now?? Asfari still a major shareholder

The sodding mm's have been keeping it down for a long time now, maybe because they DO recognise the potential and want all their mates to be able to fill their boots. On the other hand maybe they still consider it as a high risk volatile share.
Who knows?

Thoth. If I remember correctly he used proper butter!!!

Dear Citizen 79,
We've been following it for 10 years and always it is "next year" that is going to see the big blast off.
In the interim it is a lucrative playground for the grubby little market makers who continue to ensure that the share is "undervalued". In their eyes it seems it isn't.
Just have to wait (again) and see
Ho hum.

SDC surely-Squeaky Director's Chair.

".......they were only found guilty of not preventing it." Quite so much as the bean counters at SFO tried their damnedest to dredge up more dirt on the company but despite their best efforts could only drum up 75 million bucks for the exchequer

I stand by what I said last year which is that collusion between senior Execs. in a large corporation can run rings round all but the soundest set of internal controls. SFO states:-
"A key feature of the case was the complex and deliberately opaque methods used by these senior executives to pay agents across borders, disguising payments through sub-contractors, creating fake contracts for fictitious services and, in some cases, passing bribes through more than one agent and one country, to disguise their actions."
I submit that even the most hawk-eyed internal auditor would not have unravelled such a web of deceit.
In my working life I had to investigate, amongst other things, a fraud involving a mere $2.5million which, due to its pure simplicity and the pulling of rank by a senior official had gone unnoticed by both internal and external auditors.

So let us remember "....guilty of not preventing it" only, but internal controls now strengthened to prevent a recurrence and hope that prospective clients take the same view.
Whether you believe the company or not is up to you.