Member Info for VirusKiller

Watchouse, I know you mean well, but will you stop banging on about this? You are one post away from being green boxed.

I can only imagine that it's a "round up" fill from a larger trade.

> NT-1, the latter of which will be worked-over after the drilling of CH-1 to repair a minor leak in the casing string.

Is NT-2 going to be used "as is"?

Some of the answers on p11 of the AGM presentation: https://aminex-plc.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/2025-AGM-Presentation-final.pdf

Still trying to find exactly why NT-1 needs a workover and what needs to be done to NT-2 prior to hook-up.

Thanks Ufufuo! I guess I was a week or so early when I asked about well hook-up in another thread.

Would someone remind me of the likely well hook-up sequence?

Is "de-mudding" of NT-2 a requirement and something that's easily done? I vaguely recall some discussion many months ago that it was a relatively straightforward operation that didn't require a rig.

CH-1 of course.

I had it in my head that NT-2 needed a workover (due to the mud), but it's NT-1. I can't remember why it needs a workover. And workover after CH-1, right?

Indeed. It was a with a wry smile that I re-read the N-T well test RNS with the over-mudding news communicated behind the "Successful Ntorya-2 Well Test" headline. :-)

https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/AEX/successful-ntorya-2-well-test-9zo4f3jz7yvkypj.html

To clarify, I'm asking about the feed-in flow lines, not the Ntorya to Madimba pipeline.

RJ: sure. But when? Madimba is a short pipeline, but that's got a 9 month lead time. Even a couple of 1km and a 3km feed-in lines aren't just going to "happen".

Curious as I can't recall seeing this mentioned. Who's building the NT-1, NT2, and CH-1 spurs to the Madimba pipeline entry point? And when?

Unfortunately we're dealing with a number(?) of individuals on this board who have mental health problems and need help. For the rest of us, green boxing is the only way.

I hardly think the world's O&G service companies will be checking the Tanzanian papers, so yes, a legal requirement IMO.

Personally, I'm not nearly as bullish as some in terms of the CH-1 spud date. I *don't* think it will happen this year due to transport of the rig and hauling to Ntorya outside of the rainy season. I remember travelling through Uganda in the rains and our truck slip-slidin' away (literally; we had to dig it out of the mud at one point).

And, frankly, (a) there's NT-2 to re-work first (which I think requires the rig?) and (b) more than 6 months in 2026 before the pipeline is ready.

But it's going to happen. And, as a significant shareholder, that's what matters to me.

> Stockapedia and British Bulldogs are useless

That's completely fair, but they *are* using automated analysis to come to their conclusion. And other automated analyses will come to similar conclusions too. Just saying. It takes more than automated analysis to overcome that.

I have no idea what TA will do if we hit a 7 yr high, in light of that "momentum trap". But TA is real and part of the game.

As a counterpoint, Stockpedia has AEX as a momentum trap, which might deter the TA buyers. But I don't really care. I'm not massively bullish for the share price in the short term, or fussed. IMO, barring something catastrophic -- seismic political upheaval, meteorite strike, ARA 180 on buying us out -- this is going significantly North in the medium-to-long term. I've waited a long time and I can wait a year or two longer.

https://www.stockopedia.com/share-prices/aminex-LON:AEX/

> ARA Petroleum Tanzania wrote this blog in July 2025 to explain why they want to keep Aminex PLC as a partner in the Ntorya gas project

Important correction. ARA did NOT write this blog. At the top of that blog item (my emphasis):

> Here’s a strategic rationale written ****AS IF**** from ARA Petroleum Tanzania’s internal planning team, arguing for maintaining the current JV structure with Aminex PLC, emphasizing the benefits of Aminex’s London market presence:

That said, there's some logic there.

I've finally filtered you Tanzania. You are as bad as those you criticise and repeatedly goad. You have exceptionally poor Internet etiquette and are, by most definitions, a troll yourself. You are doing this board no favours.

It was not in the RNS, but this was...

"Payment may be made by the TPDC in US Dollars or Tanzanian Shillings".

Seems like a badly written/researched, possibly AI, article to me. Not understanding that Chikumbi and Ntorya are one in the same thing.

Not convinced of that PoC. Gas in the ground is worth nothing without GSA, dev license, rig contract, drill, and pipeline. We already know that there's an awful lot of gas in the ground.

I do believe that these will happen and many of them all at once, but it seems implausible that we'll get first gas by 31st Dec.

> what if SCIR found a wealthy investor to partner with, Ntorya could look extremely attractive now production has been brought forward

BG, SCIR have signed a legal agreement to sell to ARA, no?

Tanz. He's a classic example of an Internet troll, he wants attention and he is trying to wind you up. Don't let him get to you. There is no rational discussion to be had with him. Period.

Hold fire on that reply button. Stop replying to him. Just stop it now please, for all our sakes!