RE: Bubble15 Feb 2021 22:28
Look - any share that grows as much as ITM is a bubble share. It has value but is not a green business - burning hydrogen releases very high levels of Nox which will exceed acceptable limits. In addition many of the concepts for hydrolysis are simply uneconomic- below is an engineers review of offshore green hydrogen via hydrolysis. But please make up your own mind.
‘Offshore H2 is just the latest silly idea in a field full of them. Offshore wind? Sure, that's where the wind is. Offshore oil & gas - same story. But as the OP notes, doing ANYTHING offshore that you don't NEED to do is a terrible idea. Onshore hydrogen is a deeply flawed concept. Moving it offshore just makes a bad idea laughable.
The idea of using "excess" electricity is also ill-conceived. Desalination and electrolysis equipment is expensive. If we can only run it when there is excess electricity, much of the time it will sit idle. This is not a wise use of capital equipment.
Unless the offshore wind turbines are fully devoted to hydrogen production, there will also be need for parallel electric transmission cables alongside H2 pipelines, totally unnecessary compared to simply bringing ALL of the electric power onshore.
Is there a competent engineer involved ANYWHERE in the "Hydrogen Economy" insanity?’