The latest Investing Matters Podcast episode featuring financial educator and author Jared Dillian has been released. Listen here.
its 53% owned by EDF so unlikely
Look at the RNS released year to date. Would you expect the share price to be higher or lower than it was on 1st Jan? (I believe higher based on the RNS)
Now look at the top 10 holders. They are predominantly private client accounts/stockbrokers. AFC has no institutional holders so no stability you get from them,. I don't doubt that some comments on boards like lse encourage people to buy and sell which is why it is so important to stick to your own rules/philosophies. In the nearly 8 yrs AB has been in charge he has returned 15.6% annualized. The last 2 haven't been great for investors and the days of free cash are over. GLA
agreed, depending of course on what timeline any expected delivery has?
again, too many on here think the BoD job is to constantly update shareholders with positive RNS (hold back the negative ones pls). If you're (an investor) not happy with the BoD, sell and wait for new mgmt to take over. Then get back in. I find these msg boards invaluable for getting both sides of the argument but at the same time the decision to invest is mine and mine only.
why does anyone care who writes what on here? make your own decisions and ignore the noise. If everyone thought a stock was a BUY there would be no sellers/liquidity.
@KIND - you've been here since May?! People should make their own investment decisions and filter out the noise especially if they cant handle comments that go against their own. I appreciate everyone's contribution here. NW has made some great posts over the years as have many others that I thoroughly appreciate. At the end of the day we want NANO to go up.
totally agree dd!
On 11th July Tariq Hamoodi is shown to have acquired 5,509,192 shares. His entire position he currently holds. On the same day LOAM announced an decrease of 6,356,574 leaving a total position of 77,014,050.
Mifid II rules state that sellers of shares are obliged to report trades executed on a regulated market. However, the rules don't stop the buyer from also reporting the trade which happens frequently. Rather than add transparency which it was intended to do in light of 2008 it can instead duplicate trades. If a broker is involved it can often result in 3 "prints" for the same trade.
This is what I believe occurred with the "infamous" 5m clip. It was a "transfer" from LOAM to Tariq off-book trade.
dyor gla
I suspect he has "swap" positions. 10.5mln shs traded on 11/7 of which 2x 5mln relates to Tariq/LOAM. Mifid reporting rules not really helping the transparency here!
it was done at a mid-price so no MM involved. both buyer and seller clearly happy with the price
PS. I was previously LongTermHold but had issues with an old email acct so had to reregister in Jan.
I rarely post but I have been in NANO since 2016. I have been up and down a decent amount during that time. What has kept me in has been a belief in the product and the comments on this board. Some of the analysis has been outstanding over the years and if you are not professionals in this area then even more amazing. We have a way to go but I believe there will be a handsome reward for the shareholders eventually which will make the timeframe worthwhile. Thanks all
Can anyone tell me if OBC actually have a shareholding/investment in Umbria? Thanks