Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
Oh and something else that is getting Worse!
Is your systems inability to supply accurate red/blue or sales/purchases!
When it is quite obvious (well to me it is) that many are misrepresented with this share in particular, how about a level playing field for a change!
Seeing as you must be making a shed load out of all this horrendous advertising blurb!
IMO?
Sorry, but is it just me?
As the adverts are getting WORSE!
Screens jumping all over the shop, adverts now blocking very centre of screen, even when typing, screen jumps so you have to wait for it to settle before correcting typo's and continuing?
Might as well rebrand Lse to LSA London South Advertising...
Crap Crap Crap Lse... it is not conducive to good share chat it is a pain the effing backside!
imo dyor
Why ?
1: Do you really think, the BoD will choose who you want?
2: Do you really think, they will consider your suggestion list?
3: Do you not realise, that it is NOT the CEO running the show ?
4: How long do you think it will take, for sp, to recover to say £3.00, once dhsc is concluded favourably?
5: And finally a question for yourself, do you really think the huge investment you put in to Nova is coming back intact or indeed with a profit?
Id say, now everyone has what they want to a degree, how about focusing on future rather than continue to kick someone who is obviously down at present? Not that I blame her for exiting X as it has gotten far worse under Musk (imo) and also left a couple months ago...
Onwards and upwards now - hopefully!
my only concern, is suzy was the last of the original scientists left?
dont you need a degree of knowledge of 201 / 301 / 401 etc?
or are we just going for a "bull****bafflesbrains" ceo who will do, as he/she is told, too the heavyweight holders? just so they can get a big return... ?
yes suzy was in-experienced ceo, but surely there must be a position, ie chief science officer? until the original products are concluded one way or the other?
personally i would have a: never engaged certain personnel and b: would remove them before a senior science person? imo
Appears to me PI's are not wanted and hence, why assist them?
WELL... if you want them gone, increase the SP ten fold and many will disappear? Otherwise its a bit like buying a pet... A nova shareholder isnt just for Covid, its for LIFE!
Or until the sp, allows a more palatable exit!
imo dyor
WBAFC
I would be more looking at the punitive "Damages" caused to Company...
NB: Nova did everything and more to assist this Gov and like the postmasters they simply shoved it under the carpet! In favour of cheap Chinese (but more rewarding for them) crap!
The sky is the limit!
IMO DYOR
DHSC Update
Third Paragraph down
THE COMPANY CONTINUES TO BELIEVE IT HAS STRONG GROUNDS TO PURSUE ITS CLAIM FOR PAYMENT ETC ETC ETC
It was RNS'd then, no counter (negative or positive ) rns's have been made since?
Therefore it is logical to conclude, that the Company are simply waiting there time in court to pursue ALL monies owed and no doubt, interest and compensation?
Dhsc is just another gov delay tactic, as it does with everything else!
IMO Nova will be cleared and paid handsomely and those with patience will be rewarded?
DYOR
Good luck all long term holders!
Cautious? Well thats one way of putting it?
Oh and the sub postmasters had less than fcukall, but, they still got there in the end and IMO they will get more compo than currently offered?
Just as Nova will IMO
And yes Ive done my own research :)