Member Info for Unexpect3D

As you said,

You have just summed up AIM.

Frustratingly, what you have highlighted is likely to be the case unless we have intrinsic value that can’t go away.

At a guess, greed.

Though a buyout would be interesting.

Too many questions. It tells me they don’t want to tell us why.

I’m not usually one for despondency but I’m not sure I am happy about this.

Smells like I’m going to lose out.

To what end Ian?

We would still be a Penny stock.

“There was no need to re-prove that apples fall to the ground under gravity”.

That’s exactly what you do.

At the manufacturer, you check the machine does what you want it to do before you buy it in a demonstration to that effect. A performance acceptance test (PAT). Then you have your own machine made and sign it off as working in the Factory (FAT). Then you validate it has maintained capability at your Site before you sign off final payment (SAT).

The irony is that (specific) gravity plays a large part in these machines.

We should also remember that ALBA need only RNS news that will affect the share price. Not news that will affect our confidence in the share price. So procedural box ticking is not goi g to be RNSd.

But, assay results will.

Agreed Nookie.

I’ll be adding here at payday and when other stuff comes off.

Don’t tease me Westie.

I’ll take that pound.

I’m slowly building my position here. Waiting in a couple of others to fruit

It’s not a trading platform if you can’t trade in a timely manner. 212 are going to lose business if they keep going.

It’s too slow and they screw you on spread. I lost 3% on my last trade with them. Still in profit but not what I wanted.

All geared to make the small investor lose out.

If you have £££££, the fees for decent trading platforms is immaterial. If you are looking to build, then fees are a significant amount.

Must be a value thing as this share has never been fashionable.

Anyone know why?

Lovely rise today. Shame I’m still waiting for payday.

Give it a bit it might reappear. This board is circa 2000 technology and a bit ****.

Very good point champin.

True.

This board seems to have a couple of helmets that are a pain. And they always come out when there is good news.

Then end your post with /s.

Because your literal text without any context doesn’t convey the sarcasm.

/s

;-)

Doesn’t being a producer open is up to various indexes?

Just need to get the mcap right......:D

I would guess that in order to get 20g/t you need any amount.

But if that amount was 1t, there would be 20g of gold in it.

Honestly. This is really easy maths

Chrome investor,

The only points I see here are that due to the veiny, nuggety nature of the gold. This sample might have 20.7g/t but there might be a lot of quartz over a larger sample that has none. Bringing the average amount per t down.

This is what I believe others mean when they mis represent the maths.

The other thing is the word gold ‘concentrate’.

Slow down, take a breath.

Check your maths.

“Prove me wrong” what with?

Oh yes the same substantiation you gave your supposition.

Feck all.