RE: Next Year20 Dec 2020 09:05
Thanks Steve
So they will promise to update and then only do it unofficially and under q&a when pushed.
A nice try at justifying or somewhat excuse, but I think we all know it's poor shall we say. This sort of stuff has been typical. If you remember we were also told we would be updated on Vialogy tech where SG had 1 year to seek commercial future for VEC snd when IP was returned to us we were going to initially explore it and how we could benefit from it. Once again, that nothing came of it was disappointing but not our bag so acceptable in the real world. Was wasn't acceptable was again we were simply never told. It just died s death on the sands of time.
It's many such examples of poor reporting. No reporting and only getting answer A when forced to address that do make one critical and rightly so.
I too am confident we will do Well, but when we don't report we do ourselves a dis-service. We stated core product was holding up well only to say in TU it had not held up (yet another example). Vialogy used have this exact behaviour and it needs to be called out because when something really important goes wrong or should be advised a string of past ommissions allows similar non action which can be really harmful.
I shouldn't be the only one to call out poor reporting and these days I'm not.
So,I'm also confident that with firm markets holding up we will do very well and on price - which is paramount I see this as a good buying price with I hope some news coming in Jan after a poor TU and corresponding fall. I did have high hopes for the TU and expressed them in advance...20p by Xmas etc. Oh Well!!!
Sign In
Follow the stocks
