Member Info for tuan6

First rule to learn from AIMs company is RNS issues under NOMAD instructions. So they can issue whatever RNS as they like and many companies can pump that way and tell lie about its projects. It is not surprised to me as rns turn out the cost to build so different from previous ex CEO. Do you thunk you can sure and send complaint to FCA sure you can but FCA will do is dont need answers your complaint at all that us how NOMADs work in AIMs .

The true this is now start realizing cost more and just mess up thing uncontrollable. Everone come in at the point they need complete rework from start and that will take time and money . There are intangible assets and can sell at discount but that is last resource as at moment threebig miners want to keep a light on this one.

If this is so good in return why PI are selling at crazy price and lose over 90 % ? Someone have 5 millions anh buy half of company now then waiting for 2026 can sell it 500 millions. It sound too good to be true . No . Only gambler and small money to play this mine as too risk to invest now. A lot of PIs trapped this one with down 90 % only hope to getting back small portions and maybe waiting for very long or mayly all will be gone.

All of posts from previous strong hold turn out to be horrible wrong as if they believe now they lose their money and you can buy now at 3p . How 18p strong hold keep you happy now?

It will up tomorrow as they sense too risk if they cant bring it down so longer they hold more risk if PFC can find solution so close their short may be less lose their money than leave it.

I hope after full year rns public some big institutions come to Mtro as they can sense this company will recover and can bring growth in future. If that happens its share should going up faster and as high as last year.

A first year of profit ever and expand to old faction high streets still hold it value.

If La Mancha is controlling company and G Mining Services under their people why they public review with 87% increase fund? Something is wrong or intended from La Manch to kill it off ? As if they can put this company into administration then buy it then with cheapest price they can get half mine build with lose from shareholders ? How can cost so much difference each other?

They dont want to spend more money with huge responsibilities instead but it off and start again .

On LSE only gamber and shorters so how company and investors put their money on companys any more? Asking FCA how they managements on any AIM companys and how big trouble it is .

Nobody know for sure if the institutions are in in the buying and/or selling as they have power to influence small PIs follow. That will crash share price . So we have three days report as that reason why it cant be disclose on the day they buy or sell.

Untill CEO go away this share will be like this as this company proved its history about leadership from CEO. He cant expand forever and losing money on very years. That isain trouble and he doesn't want lose his control to any else. Many big or small fund buy to hope business growth but in the end they sold it for losing money.

CEO need to go .

If someone with intent to invest 450 millions why dont buy whole company and get risk off all responsibility with very cheap price now? That is what outcome for this kind of fund company need and then shareholders will be gone. Many company in the same situation and all of them sell off with new ower then old shareholders disappear.

Big fund don't kind enough to give their money to help poor one . They only want to make money on other debt with cheapest entry and then gone.

It is cold now and waiting for end of year results RNS. Shorters are so confident as they think it will down . PIs are more confident thus is under value and this RNS will kill shorters. We will find out but last time they update share increases double so what about this time?

Let me reminder PFC said more than one time they wuld like to sell some non core assets if that can make a deal so share will back up 80p as simple as that . Can they do that ?

Cineworld debt over £ 4 billions so they must be gone . Cant compare with this one as they dont need to pay anyone debt at moment. They need money but they still dont break the bank yes .

It is leadership and CEO make this share lost its value. Bussiness base good and yoy increases income but its share values lost a most . We need the way vote to change CEO then should this share back to 1000p. CAnt believe this one over 1000p now you can but at 68p , Over many year value have been build in but why its share lost it ? He cant be a good public CEO at all .

Short selling is the way to keep share value balance as if ban shots share maybe they use media to pump share then run away like many AIMs at moment. That us why it is important to keep both side on the war as soon as they pump it some one will take it down . .

Many AIMs company use this pump and drump that cost a lost momey for retail investors . So dont ban shot as that will make opportunities for whoever enter and exit to make money . Yes we are all makingmoney that is including long holders and shorters . Nothing wrong about that .

You can buy as any share as you can afford at moment around 9p and sell it when it up. Nobody tuch this share when it need big fund to do it job. Untill fund secure and its future will brings more buyers as nothing for sure at moment . That is why all big holder run away and they drump this share as they first to keep their capital secure then doesn't care this will multi bags or disappear . Many mines have been dumped and that show how risk it is when nothing certain .

Schroder says they notified PFC on 1/12/2023 ...PFC notified the market on 10/01/2024

If this is true and have public domain so we can send all this info to FCA for investigation as they cant withold this info over month . This is completely wrong and should face big fine as they break the listing rule . This is 250 so it is more stringen control and not like AIM company base on NOMAD on RNS .

Someone can find all RNS about this case and sent it to FCA as this act from company destroyed a lot value and make retail lose money as we cant get corrected and timely info .

Whole last year interest increases so much so all bank will getting big boost as income increases. Nothing hide behind this fact and next month will show off its true picture.

There is background seller to drump all their holding so until we see TR1 share will suffer down more as more buy than sell but price drop . Big order for sell to be filled.

This is old news and that finished long time . There is nothing to do with that and things have been selte down for years .

Shorters not moving to close so they are confident something very bad and share must be lower than 28p now. There are some concerns about fund and CEO said that they want to sell some non core assets. If that can execute so shorters will burn then share will back 70p soon.

Full copy of text on AMGO from FAC website so someone interested in reading , There are more to learn from.

https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/final-notices/amigo-loans-ltd-2023.pdf