Member Info for TT-T

Ten times as many trades as we have seen in recent 'busy' days and even those could see the price moving up a reasonable amount. This buying is nothing to what we can expect when testing results are released or similar good news from Ireland.

The 15 Dec RNS has a pretty good summary, with the updates that the CPR has already been published and the mou-1 testing is now expected q2 rather than q1 (understandable delays given Covid)

Or awareness growing of what we have all been discussing

This is the thread: https://mobile.twitter.com/lseaim/status/1490287086267731970

If you Google prd Twitter, the top posts under #prd include them. I don't use it myself but will look that way from time to time.

A Nigel by any other name...

I know it's quite amusing this evening. Some better than usual attempts but the combined surge makes the FUD unusually transparent.

I see no reason why we need any settled posit on funding yet. There is nothing we need funding that is not already paid for in the immediate future, and one which I am more comfortable with following each new update.

I'll admit it was nerve racking back in July when the data looked good but the market reacted so badly. Each announcement since has justified that positive interpretation of MOU-1.

Its like nuisance gulls following the fishing vessel. They are only there when there is a good chance of something positive coming out of it, they don't pester the ferries in the same way.

All I can say is it hasn't been missed by everyone. Having read through the RNS now, I feel considerably more confident. I agree it was well written and has provided considerable confirmation in our previous assessments.

Once again my thanks to you Wacky and everyone else on here who has provided tangible analysis amidst the noise. Here's to 2022.

Some very interesting details to help the context of past actions. Will want to read this a couple of times I'd say, but great start to the day.

How on earth can they expect Trinidad to be cash flow generative in 2022 having thrown their toys out of the pram. That seems to be bordering on misleading doesn't it?

There is a comment on page 13 of the July 2020 presentation that NuTech confirms permeability for GRF1-TGB2a

There are three dates though aren't there - declaration date, ex-dividend date and payment date. It's who holds the shares on just before the ex-dividend date that matters, not the payment date or declaration date. That's the trigger point. However, even that doesn't always apply if certain assets are ring fenced for shareholders on the record at X date. That is a pseudo-ex-dividend date that works a little differently than normal.

I've held other shares in mining co's that have confirmed that future sales of assets, at whatever price they are sold at, will be shared between shareholders on the register on x date, whether or not they still hold shares in the future. I then received payments long after divestment which was nice.

Admin cleared up a troll post, I think they cleared out the whole chain with it

I'm wondering if its similar to the issue of timing when he talked about the discovery bonus and being glad at not fully testing yet. PG didnt want to trigger events until all ducks were in a row. Get the double drill, triple test done and announce everything together to be in a more advantageous position for next steps.

There is indeed: https://www.reddit.com/r/PredatorOilandGasPRD/

Someone set up a new account with a Capital "i" instead of an l, presumably to troll our resident troll.

It was the best of times, it was the blurst of times

What on earth was this supposed to demonstrate anyway? A small company that visibly did little if anything voluntarily closing itself? No winding up petition, not unpaid debts, no evidence of complaints? In all GRHs publicly acknowledged UK and non uk history (and you must have researched both) so what?

Nobody who is remotely serious or knowledgeable of commerce would bat an eyelid at that. Moreover it has no impact whatsoever on the prospects of PRD nor of the data based views GRH has espoused. Reeks of desperation in a personal vendetta, and only shows what little you have to say on PRD related data.