The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
Just trying the telegram link - I don't use telegram but, to enter the site it wants my birth date - do you really have to scroll back month by month to get to your birth date?! Can't seem to be able to just enter it manually or find a pick list?
No, not me? I was going to have a laugh winding up Wolfie but, when I came back to look for a riposte I saw the thread was gone.
I didn't look back through the whole thread but I didn't see anything offensive or rule breaking? I, like you saw it as a bit of bantz?
π€·
Once again - just for the hard of reading and to keep the FUD under control.
CREDIBLE PARTY STILL IN NEGOTIATIONS
SUFFICIENT CASH FOR THE YEAR
NO UPDATE ON NON OWNED DEPOSITS
NEW CEO AFTER SALE OF ASSETS
NYUD β NO FINAL DECISION
COURT CASES β LOGIC β SETTLED. Q+M β CANβT COMMENT ON ONGOING COURT CASE
NDAβS β VARIABLE AND NEW ONES SIGNED IN JUNE. 1 TO 3 YEAR TIME LINE
ANNUAL REPORT β MUCH TOUGER THIS YEAR β HENCE THE DELAY
OPTIONS β CHURAKOV βS CANCELLED
SALE PROCESS β BOD FOCUSSED ON THE SALE β MADE CLEAR MULTIPLE TIMES
JN LEAVING β EPC SPECIALIST SO NOT CURRENTLY NEEDED
NO ROYALTY PAID
DFS β LEGAL PROCEDURES NEED TO BE FOLLOWED BEFORE IT CAN BE PUBLISHED
RESOLUTIONS 6+7 β CRITICAL YEAR. HOPE TO FINALISE THE SALE SO OPTION NEEDS TO BE THERE IN CASE ITβS NEEDED
MT FLANKS β MKT WORK ONGOING
JORC β SUBJECT TO RUSSIAN SYSTEM AND WILL BE PUBLISHED WHEN DFS IS RELEASED
SUBSIDIARIES β MONEY CAPITALISED AS LOANS β PRE-WAR EXPENDITURE. NO INTERUPTIONS TO OPERTAIONS AT ALL IN RUSSIA
AM β VALUED MEMBER OF THE BOARD.
SINOSTEEL β NOT CONSIDERING AS SALE IS WHAT THEY WANT BUT IS STILL AN OPTION
PGM STOCKPILE β WILL BE SOLD
SALE CONFIDENCE β VERY HOPEFUL IT WILL BE COMPLETED THIS YEAR
GOOD RELATIONSHIP WITH RUSSIAN AUTHORITIES β NOT ENCOUNTERED ANY SERIOUS OBJECTIONS AND THEYβRE IMPRESSED WITH THE AUTHORITIES
CS β SIGNIFICANT SHAREHOLDER AND AT 70 YEARS OLD DESERVES A REST.
DIVIDEND β WILL BE PAID UPON SALE OF ASSETS
DRAG LINE PERFORMING VERY WELL AND IS CURRENTLY STOCK PILING ORE AFTER SOME MINOR GLITCHES EARLY ON
SIGNIFICANT SAVINGS BEING MADE USING ELECTRIC
EURASIA V2 β MOVING INTO H2 AND RENEWABLE ENERGY. STILL IN DEVELOPMENT
HANDS TIED WITH RESTRICTIONS REGARDING THE BUYER
LARGE SHAREHOLDERS NO BETTER INFORMED THAN PIβs
NEW CEO TO BE APPOINTED AFTER SALE IS COMPLETED
STILL NOT DIRECTLY AFFECTED BY SANCTIONS
BOD MUST PROTECT THE INTERESTS OF ALL SHAREHOLDERS
Wolfie - we don't know it will be "heavily discounted", that's just your assumption. It may be fair to say that the price could have been higher without the war but, it is simply unknowable.
If an offer is eventually put to shareholders then, and only then, will you get your answer as to whether the majority shareholders (as opposed to the majority of folk) will accept that offer. It won't have anything to do with what the majority of folk want. Personally, of course I'll want more than my average, and would likely accept anything above that at the earliest opportunity rather than an indefinite amount of time for an indefinite increase in offers.
As Tilly used to say, "each to their own" (except with the incorrect spelling of their :-) )
GLAGH
Scuba, I guess the carp can't be biting today?
Seeing as you're so desperate for some attention, no - I don't hold much hope for DR's Β£3.50, though I am starting to think his 'little man' prediction might be spot on?
Good luck genuine peeps.
Excuse me Wolfie - Mr 'I'm not getting involved' (whilst getting involved)! :-)
I'm not 'egging on' anyone? For better or worse, I speak for myself and think for myself.
I don't necessarily approve of IKN and DR's tactics but I can see why they do it - to defend their investment against the trolls. And, slightly ashamedly, I do sometimes laugh at the way they wind-up the negheads like youself.
Scuba, Toffers, Rickstars, TF, TC, have to take the blame for reducing this board to the standard you might expect on ADVFN.
Scuba/CTC - You can try and twist the truth (not to mention deleting your posting history to hide all the lies and nastiness - though I still believe you were banned for bullying threats).
"The HCW report, i note that you never requested anyone else to provide evidence but then it was one of the crew you hang out with so you wouldnt want them to run the risk of posting it here."
It wasn't me who asked for proof. Can't remember who, but, when it became clear that you were BS'ing about having the report someone who clearly did have the report asked you to provide the last word on a certain page. You made some feeble excuses, went quiet for a bit before coming back and attacking the next investor you seemed to think was being a bit too positive.
"Iβve not been posting here since the 42p days, but i have been following the board"
That's the point - you specifically said you had been here telling everyone they were wrong from 42p, yet CTC didn't exist until you claimed to have bee lucky to have just bought in at (about) 27p. I repeat, either lying about posting or lying about not being another moniker. One way or the other you lied.
You suggested I green bin you and, whilst that always been tempting to put you in a box that matches the bile you spew day and night on here, I would prefer know what lies you are spreading about a company in which I'm invested.
Good luck to honest people.
Lied about not being CTC.
Lied about having posted from 42p down to 4p. (Or, otherwise was lying about not having been a previous moniker to CTC).
Lied about having the HCW report (or least was unable to provide a simple proof when asked).
That's just off the top of my head, and the disturbing thing is you lied for weeks about not being CTC with the same supercilious attitude as when you claim to be telling the truth. Leaves me with no choice but assume nothing you write is believable.
GLAGH
Del, my thoughts are I'm not qualified, nor do I have access to all the facts to say how the case will go. At a very high level, I support the board in not issuing a replacement, or accepting (pointless) temporary indemnity. I shared this view months ago. I don't think any good can come of anyone here speculating further.
You must surely see that Toffers, apart from being totally cray-cray, is hell bent on destroying the EUA's reputation and not interested in anything else. She does not deserve a response from anyone.
GL
Of course none of them have a clue, they're probably not even capable of becoming decent baristas let alone barristers. :-)
But that's not the point, it's just way of endlessly posting FUD. I still can't tell if Del is complicit, or just doesn't care or realise he's the he's the FUD spreaders poster-boy?
Good luck to anyone who's a genuine holder and still here reading this gloop - I'll have a flat white please.
CITIC were apponited on a success fee basis. UBS/VTB were I think bought in to do a strategy review - presumably a finite piece of work rather than an ongoing appontment.
Haven't gone thru all the RNS's to see of there was any further invokvement?
I'm regretting saying "don't be a stranger" after you sold out Wolfie.
"Thank you, TT. Iβm going to take a little break but Iβll look in now and again. No share bashing guaranteed!"
If I'd known you were going to take up a full-time position as Scuba's wing-man* I would never have said it. :-) Looked like about 20 posts yesterday alone, more than when you were invested maybe?
(* that's a tough and dirty job, but it does sound like he desperately needs to get laid :-) ).