Member Info for TripodMan

Did the same at QBT. Punted in £1m, acquired warrants of 100,000,000 @ 2p per share, then before you know it, he's out.

He's heavily into ZOE I believe. Personally, I'd never invest in anything he has a hand in again.

Blue numbers on a rainy day, makes my soul, makes my soul, drip, drip, drip away...

...could be very interesting.

News is due imminently and both Bitcoin and Ethereum are on the up.

This week I fully expect a push towards the 2p mark. Surpassing that would be massive.

Good luck to you all and hold onto your hats, stargazers.

*Apologies, I meant to type 10p not 20p.

The court case(s) will be a nice bonus if we are successful with them. Admittedly, the cash boost they would provide would enable a nice investment in further R&D/ventures, but personally I'm forgetting about them until they happen. There's more meat on the bone here than them.

Any increase in BTC or other crypto's Francesco hinted at, can only serve to bolster the SP. It certainly wouldn't do it any harm, and long may it continue.

I still have a gripe, and would be grateful if anyone with a better knowledge of the way these things work could just comfort me a little. It relates to our former shareholder, John Story. As part of his £1m investment, he was also awarded 100,000,000 in warrants @ 2p exercisable for a period of 2 years. If I were FG, I'd be pretty p****ed off that someone that was no longer invested could manipulate the SP with that amount of shares. If the SP went up to say 20p, am I right in thinking Story could use his warrants within a 2 year period to buy 100,000,000 at 2p, and then the next day dump the lot making an 8p per share profit for example? If so, maybe FG will play the long game and wait for those warrants to expire before exploding the tech?

Ps, I'm not de-ramping here. I hold 400k @ avg 2p but would just like a bit of clarity if I have read that situation correctly.

Anyonne that hadn't algaefied this individual must need their bumps felt

I think Francesco hinted he was going after other cryptosas well.as BTC, so all the bull runs would be most welcome.

Eth is doing alright today. Let's hope.

Eddie,

Yes, relentlessly. Sooner that's all dealt with the better. Would be a nice bit of dough, but the real bread as you say is in the tech

The court case has to be won yet. Until it is, it's all moot.

I think you maybe need to take a break, Schalfenplanet. Take that shaggy dog of yours out for a walk. Life is too short to get gnarled up about things posted on here.

Ta ta.

Indeed Sajad.

Obliged. I had replied re P.I. insurance to Toger's post.

Personally, I couldn't care less what an anonymous person on an anonymous forum has to say about me. Not one iota. Water off a duck's back.

Which would come under professional undemnity insurance. Either way, it's covered.

Have a look at fidelity guarantee insurance.

I think the majority of people on here have you filtered, which is why you are not getting a response.

The heir is now involved because the case resolution will have an obvious effect on any estate left by the deceased.

Misterhambo,

Agree 100%. Not quite the image for the main man of a public company. Looks amateur.

I hate subterfuge. Hate it. And as anyone who knows me will tell you, skullduggery is anathema to me.

Gardener now, but wasn't always one.

Play fair or don't play at all.

That aside, any blue day is a good day.

Indeed Eddie.

However, some people are easily swayed by now deleted tweets.

Just ensuring I make people aware if I ever suss something out.

My apologies, the actual words were:

'In court settlement'

Just for clarity. Screenshots are wonderful things.