Member Info for trillsg

https://www.westlondonliving.co.uk/health-fitness/health-beauty/our-go-to-premium-cbd-brand/

Thanks for the Proactive link Longlad.

"Anticipate needing to double their lab space in 2020" suggests double the amount of clients. Won't belong until we're dealing with all the top 20 cosmetic companies. Good times ahead.

At 1.77, Nice one!

Intrigued by this Tweet. Maybe more than the lab extension to be announced.

@Labskin
are taking customer service to new levels. Hand-delivered #Labskin on
@Eurostar
??to a major client in a very important week

https://twitter.com/gjbrandon/status/1191779664664125441?s=20

https://marketsgazette24.com/2019/11/05/dandruff-treatment-market-expected-to-witness-a-sustainable-growth-with-top-players-alliance-pharma-plc-kramer-laboratories-integumen-plc-avista-capital-partners-dana-limited-and-others/

They're testing our CBD to validate it's usefulness in cosmetics. We are clearly doing everything necessary to meet Europe's stringent rules on this. Many competitors will be pushed out due to nonconformity of legislation. Good to see NT is forward thinking.

Good post Money. All respectable companies will be on our clients list in the near future, time is money. Watched several podcasts over the weekend and several seem to think they will be bought out by one of their blue chip clients. Haven't bought in for that as might be years off, see this as a long term investment too.

You need to thumb Chris more to show your appreciation towards the info he gives to this board.

Can't keep up with demand, Blue chip clients, funding not needed, no competition, award winning technology to name but a few positives. The sp should be ten fold today's price!

Thanks James. Charts look like a stairway to Heaven.

I'm in. Interesting time ahead. GLA

Re-post but very positive article quoting Zoetic as one to watch.

European cannabis has become a “prime investment target for excess cash” for North American firms emboldened by high valuations in USA, a sector expert says.....

https://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/companies/news/904508/european-legal-cannabis-a--prime-investment-target--for-north-american-money-904508.html

Spear, can you go to your room please. The adults want to talk.

I agree, ring that bell Nick. I'm sure shareholders won't begrudge that coming out the funds. You've earned it IMO. And as said, no better way to introduce us to America.

A: OTC listing

B: Sale of Assets

C: Sale of seeds

D: Expansion of sales with Mr Checkout

E: Chill sales

F: Zoetic sales

Nobody can say we've nothing to get excited about


Or

Spear, 60 times monthly revenue is possible as is 2 times. Nobody knows. This gives a ballpark figure I believe.

Valuing oil and gas properties held by individuals or estates at three times (3x) annual cash flow (“3x Cash Flow”) has been a widely used rule of thumb for decades. More sophisticated users of the rule might apply it only to working interests......
Potential Distortions in Valuation

Sophisticated buyers and sellers of oil and gas properties know that there can be significant value attributable to non-producing properties. Use of the 3x Cash Flow multiple applied to a collection of producing and non-producing properties implicitly gives little or no value to the non-producing properties. Consider a 1,000 acre mineral tract in the Eagle Ford or Marcellus shale that has been producing cash flow of approximately $100,000 per year from a non-shale depth. Under the rule, the minerals would have an implied value of $300,000. A closer examination might show that the property has significant upside potential related to the shale play and that the lease bonus on the shale depth minerals alone might approximate $2,500 to $5,000 per acre or $2.5 to $5 million on a 1,000 acre tract. Clearly, the magnitude of such a lease bonus (and the expected royalty cash flow stream from future production) implies a substantially higher value for the property than the rule of thumb approach
https://www.stout.com/en/insights/article/valuation-oil-and-gas-properties-are-they-really-worth-3x-cash-flow/

Valuing oil and gas properties held by individuals or estates at three times (3x) annual cash flow (“3x Cash Flow”) has been a widely used rule of thumb for decades. More sophisticated users of the rule might apply it only to working interests......
Potential Distortions in Valuation

Sophisticated buyers and sellers of oil and gas properties know that there can be significant value attributable to non-producing properties. Use of the 3x Cash Flow multiple applied to a collection of producing and non-producing properties implicitly gives little or no value to the non-producing properties. Consider a 1,000 acre mineral tract in the Eagle Ford or Marcellus shale that has been producing cash flow of approximately $100,000 per year from a non-shale depth. Under the rule, the minerals would have an implied value of $300,000. A closer examination might show that the property has significant upside potential related to the shale play and that the lease bonus on the shale depth minerals alone might approximate $2,500 to $5,000 per acre or $2.5 to $5 million on a 1,000 acre tract. Clearly, the magnitude of such a lease bonus (and the expected royalty cash flow stream from future production) implies a substantially higher value for the property than the rule of thumb approach
https://www.stout.com/en/insights/article/valuation-oil-and-gas-properties-are-they-really-worth-3x-cash-flow/

Nick Tulloch’s plan for Zoetic International PLC (LON:ZOE) envisages it becoming one of the UK’s best-known premium CBD brands......
https://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/companies/news/905754/zoetic-international-targets-premium-end-of-cbd-market-905754.html

It's good to debate this. I'd have thought the 60 months quoted take in to consideration well declines else it might be 100 months. Future POO expectations must play a major part. As Chesh points out, carried interest on any new wells must be worth a fair bit. What would the monthly interest on an $8mill loan over 5 years be? I calculate that $150,000 p/m would be 13% p/a then pure profit after that. Sounds a good deal to me.

So if it's to be believed, that if buying well royalties, you should expect to pay the equivalent of 60 times it's monthly income. That would be $9,000,0000. Call it $8,000,000 due to tax and cost deductions.