Charles Jillings, CEO of Utilico, energized by strong economic momentum across Latin America. Watch the video here.
I have a rule, not to invest more than 5% of portfolio in any one stock. I ignored this here as it "felt different" and ended up about at about 40% of my capital. The lesson for me is to stick to your own rules, even if it feels different
Well at this price, it's too cheap to be worth selling. Might as well wait for US results.
Simply Wall Street articles are computer generated. This might work for larger, more predictable companies but obviously not for an event driven stock like this. For example they are surprised by the increased cash burn in the last year. Obviously the AI isn't aware of the Sprinter trial
I note my broker, Fidelity is on the list. However as well as a broker, they are also a fund manager. What isn't clear is whether this percentage applies to the nominee accounts (if that's the right word? I mean the likes of me), or shares held within a mutual fund they manage. This could apply to other institutions on the list too
Actually mine was the last trade at 1639, using up the last £100 in my trading account. Not sure why it didn't change the closing price :)
I'd always thought not, but some reading on the subject makes it less clear cut...
https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/100913/basics-short-selling.asp
Sorry to hear that cmww. You are right about the lack of publicity around long covid, which in some ways is more worrying than the initial infection to me. I am seeing a lot more vaccine hesitancy now with the booster jabs which is worrying (but understanding) and I think people really need all of the facts, including about long covid risk, to be able to make an informed decision.
I'm not a chartist but I'm enjoying looking at today's up to now! :)
And of course, if you find it so frustrating having to reply to new posters, you could always elect not to reply at all!
Thanks Skippy. I noticed the US listing closed at about 211p so it'll be interesting to see what we open at this morning
Is there a reason why LSE has a bid and ask of 175-225? Is this just a glitch?
If there's a new wave of investors, that means we're getting more widely known about by the general public, which can only be a good thing?
I've had my 2 doses and will get the booster when it's my turn. However this latest variant does make you wonder how sustainable the vaccination approach can be. They might be able to alter the vaccine to match the variant but what happens when it mutates again (and again and again)?
More fascinating mask based reading here...
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7447000/
Im no expert on TA but if you look at the 1 month chart it looks like it is bottoming out at about 170 so this does look like a good price to have bought in at. This maybe the point at which people who have sold start buying back in again in anticipation / fomo?
Whilst I wouldn't advocate going all in on any stock, this really does feel different to any other investment I have made in terms of risk and reward and my normal rules for diversification/ max exposure have gone out of the window!
Good call! I wonder how far it will go?
I think you've got it spot on, on both points cr1909
Im not really a trader (despite the name!) But I don't understand why they are spoken of so negatively on here? Surely trading is necessary to provide liquidity for everyone else?
Case in point... 2 articles on Income stocks recommended selling NG on Saturday and buying NG on Monday! It's basically just clickbait to try and get you to sign up to their paid for subscriptions