Member Info for Torreaguas

dimsum3, go away you dumpling. Or at least get to know the posters on here before judging.

I agree Sam, I did that for ages and it mostly ends up with losses. Just pick a share you believe in, buy and have some patience.

Good Luck.

£20k buy just reported. MM's def keeping this down for a buyer.

JBER just moved to 1.4 in one move !

A number of £10k buys being reported late again. Someone is clearly still taking the sweeties from the kiddies.

Obviously have a load to sell. Once they are cleared we will rise pretty quick. It is simply down to how many they need to clear.

50 Members, Nice One, thanks.

ok thanks for the replies.

Been out for a couple of hours, whats the talk of an rns? who is buying and how do we know?

no idea who it is but there have been 13 buys today of 1m+

and yet another 1m+ buy just reported from 10.46am. Who is nicking the cheap shares off the scaredy cats?

The next RNS imo will be 'under notifiable interest' Which will make everyone and his dog buy in.

That is why for today they are taking the micky out of all weak holders while they can.

then you are daft. Another 1m buy just gone though from an hour ago. Have a look at the last 3 1m+trades, all buys.

The only pi's wanted here are sellers. Buyers are just interfering with the big boys getting their fill. That is why it is down, just shake out as many as possible at this level before they have to pay a bit more.

small sellers and the weak being mugged off, then the big 1m buys shows later. Someone is taking sweeties off the babies.

The document also states.

"Please note that this response relates solely to matters that are relevant to the Environment Agency’s planning remit. This response does not represent endorsement or opposition to the proposed development as submitted. Ultimately it is for the Local Planning Authority to determine this planning application."

OK found it thanks. I have read it and really cannot see what all the fuss is about. There is 1 objection, the HRA.

In the document it states

"Previously the planning application for the initial well tests WSCC/040/17/BA contained a HRA within section 10 of the environmental report, which was reviewed by ourselves. We accepted that this previous HRA sufficiently assessed possible issues relating to groundwater quality.

The current proposal though is for a longer duration and larger scope than the previous application. As such in line with the previous application we would require an equivalent/updated HRA, which accounts for the existing proposal. ".

So they need an updated HRA, pretty simple imo.

The other 'objections' are not objections but 'Advice to Applicant"

All Angus have to do here is agree to take note of the 'advice' and act on it. It is not an objection. Pretty much like having an MOT, you fail on some things and get 'advisories' on others.

The head of the document also reads :

"Although we have no objection in principal to the proposed development, we currently object to the planning application as submitted due to insufficient information."

So they simply need to update the HRA which is probalby why the company have not commented. It will probably have already been sorted. IMO.

This looks to me like the ENvironment Agency just covering their backs.

ocelot, i was refering to the apparant objection from the Environment Agency. I cant find it in the list, any idea of the date and which one it was? thanks.

Can anyone point to the exact link on the west sussex objections page to this particular objection. I can seem to find it. Thanks.

Charlie, as you will no doubt know, someone who pumps and dunmps will always be posting other share tips on lots of bbs.

Go try and find me doing that. You will see nothing. Yesterday was a genuine error. You are welcome to check my history if you like.

and over 500m traded yesterday so they are most likely out.