Member Info for tony1721

not sure what benefit would come of it . oh yes lol the chairman could make lots of money out of one and still have one lol if he makes money we will good luck all

not meaning that would happen . but very funny duc and viy at same time and chaiman of both .then reading there web site seeing cross holdings mmmmmm

aim is so dodgy look at what tvz done but got away with it scum

from duc web site ......There will be no limit on the number of projects into which the Company may invest, and the Company’s financial resources may be invested in a number of propositions or in just one investment, which may be deemed to be a reverse takeover pursuant to Rule 14 of the AIM Rules. Where the Company builds a portfolio of related assets it is possible that there may be cross-holdings between such assets. The Company does not currently intend to fund any investments with debt or other borrowings but may do so if appropriate.

have a look at prem great rns .

my thinking is in some way facilities or support in oil

● The Company will consider acquiring one or more companies, or subsidiaries of companies, focussed in the facilities management and or support services sectors. The Directors and Proposed Directors believe that the Facilities Management and Support Services sectors offer attractive opportunities to build a profitable group going forward. Acquisition targets will be either UK based or with a sizeable UK presence, which offer the ability to grow both organically and potentially through further acquisitions. ● Any such acquisition or acquisitions are likely to be acquired through a combination of equity issued to vendors and cash, but may include other forms of finance such as debt. Depending on the size of any acquisition, it is likely that the first such acquisition under the Investing Policy will be deemed to be a reverse takeover for the purpose of the AIM Rules, which would require shareholder approval and re-admission of the Company, as enlarged by the acquisition, to trading on AIM

A reverse merger is also much less influenced by current market conditions as opposed to the more traditional IPOs (Initial Public Offering). An IPO is when a private company offers stock to the public for the first time ever, essentially raising capital while simultaneously filing with the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission). This is also called a stock market launch, and it can be risky, costly, and take a lot of time to meet requirements and finalize the process. Reverse mergers get the job done much quicker, and at less expense than a traditional IPO. In fact, most reverse mergers take about thirty days to be completed, as opposed to over a year for an IPO. Many companies choose to bypass the IPO process because market conditions can drastically change in that long timeframe, but they generally stay about the same in the time it takes to complete a reverse merger, a plus for any company considering this route. Reverse mergers can also help a company finance anything from working capital to product development, although the capital gained from the merger generally takes longer to come in than with an IPO, so there is a tradeoff.

Concentrations of phosphate at the Chilisai Licence Area are found in a shallow (average overburden in the licence area is 3 metres), thin (approximately 1 metre), flat-lying, practically continuous sedimentary layer occupying most of the licence area of approximately 836 square kilometres. Three distinct lithologies are present in the phosphate bearing zone; from top to bottom, a weakly cemented plate, a nodule zone, and a pebble zone. In historic reports the P2O5 content averaged 10.1% without much variation vertically or horizontally. According to the Competent Person's Report that is a part of the Admission Document, resources are more than sufficient to support a conceptual 10 million tonnes per year

The first samples of this NP fertilizer are now being sent to potential users in Kazakhstan in order to solicit preliminary orders. The tests reports and design parameters for the front end design are anticipated before year end, and Sunkar plans to complete a feasibility study, with regard to building a plant to produce NP fertilizer during the first half of 2014. The Company will provide an update on further developments of the NP fertilizer granulation project as and when appropriate. Strategic Partnership The management's main goal remains the development of the chemical complex for the Chilisai Project to produce DAP/MAP. The management team is continuing to hold strategic partnership talks with a number of industry participants and financial institutions concerning the Chilisai Project, with the aim of achieving the Company's objective of becoming a world-class vertically integrated phosphate producer. Further announcements will be made as and when appropriate.

wow that would be nice lol

A group of Travelzest shareholders is determined to continue the fight against what they see as “the new face of corporate theft.” They appear to be making some progress, with Grant Thornton UK acknowledging by e-mail that the conduct of Travelzest directors is being investigated. That group includes Non-Executive Chairman Christopher Howell; Non-Executive Director Nigel Jenkins; Group Finance Director Adrian Cobbold and Non-Executive Director & Company Secretary Richard Hall. Matt Coen, who represents the TVZ Action Group, says the shareholders are trying to bring “this new face of corporate theft to the attention of the public.” He describes the scenario as follows: “This is an abuse of the insolvency proceedings where Directors can effectively steal companies from shareholders and not be held accountable. This is not the 1st time this has happened and sadly it will probably not be the last. It is a loophole in the current law and a lot of other people will lose their savings if these immoral Directors are not brought to task.” In the case of Travelzest, Coen describes how the shareholders’ group views the process that saw their investmentreduced to nothing: “In a nutshell, 'Aldenham Grange Trust' bought Travelzest's debt from Barclays using one of their companies. They then demanded the debt be paid in full and when Travelzest could not pay the entire amount, they bought Travelzest's assets at a massively discounted price using the name of a different one of their companies.” The shareholders’ group believes “This was planned and stage managed for months.” Coen says following the sale of the company, shareholders and unsecured creditors were offered an amount that would have reduced a £2000 investment in Travelzest to £6. “The shareholders are disgusted and insulted by this offer and they continue to bring to light the injustice of this sordid fiasco,” says Coen. “They are now 'tweeting' the British Prime Minister and they have also received official letters from '10 Downing Street' acknowledging the situation. Shareholders also have meetings planned for the end of the month with their Local Ministers of Parliament.” Follow us here: Comments Jamie 2014-01-28 20:07:28 How long before itravel2000 has to close its doors? The current "senior" management team could easily mess up a two car funeral. This company is now the armpit of the online travelindustry with zero chance of surviving the horrible reputation it has established by stealing from shareholders, robbing long term employees of severances, leaving mothers on maternity leave jobless, and employees on sick leave with no benefits! The Directors plan to hide behind some sealed court documents backfired. It seems no one is going away until justice is served.... Christine Flanagan 2014-01-28 15:40:45 Everyone should read www.itravel2000.co.uk and m

but looking at your posts you know that

on face book its i travel2000 & the cruise pofessionals the truth about corporate theft your best of talking to maff on there

are you in the action group

no lol

to many selling just need a few buys .which i hope come soon ;

this share can only go one way in the year or 2 up up up im a builder and last year every new house i was working on was fitting led lights inside and out the market for led can only get bigger and bigger

one sell down 5% so 3 buys should be up 10% come on roll up buy some lol

no want him her to buy more lol