RE: Board Pollution21 Oct 2020 19:55
This may not go down well, but let me make an argument against filtering the other side.
First let me clarify I do not agree with psmith64. He can see the facts of life as we all can, but I disagree with his conclusion regarding its impact on ITM (except maybe the market's reaction to any announcement next week, that could go either way).
My argument would be this. Where else can you discover what the other side of the trade is thinking? These boards when used well, like this one is, let the other side of the trade tell you exactly what they're thinking and how they'll react. That's priceless. We can see reasons why the price is under pressure, not because Smithy has any powers of persuasion over enough investors to move the markets, we all know he doesn't. But we know his opinion is shared by many on his side of the trade already and they've never even heard of psmith64. Remember in early Summer when we all read the flip-flopping over ITM going to crash, fly, crash, fly. I bet 100's of psmith64s out there changed their minds in exactly the same way.
So, I've stopped getting irritated by the constant repetition, because the gold I'm waiting for is when I read that his position has changed again and he interprets newsflow and reports from ITM signifying growth and thus concludes the share price is no longer going to fall to 175p. But currently I wouldn't put my neck out and suggest it'll be after next week's report...but who knows? I certainly don't know what they're going to say, but I know what I'd like them to say.