Oh Spacman you started off with an amusing if somewhat implausible SPAC deal and like all of your compatriots on here you revert eventually to the trader / shorter of stocks you obviously are. Not one of you is a LTH of anything. Poor Dox D doesn’t even have a LT memory
Oh dear our pseudoscientist must have finished his copy of Beano.
At least I don’t claim Synairgen scientist are idiots one week and proclaim them inventors of distinction the next.
Have you tried keeping a diary of your posts?
“We can’t even judge from the NHS stats the prognosis of those patients hence UNIVERSAL”
I think there’s a pretty big clue in the title of the graph
“Acute Respiratory Infection” in an emergency dept?
A very large number of these patients will not be suitable for our trial, we know that but we don’t need a very large number. We need a relatively small number from a very large pool attending emergency depts.
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/nvcgrkok7qlb7qob0tdxt/AcuteRespiratory.png?rlkey=q5vkws64qji1pxo6ixz6pi6ki&dl=0
Ghia
That’s all the stats were ever meant to be hope that we could fill a trial whether we stated it in January or July.
The trial will answer the question as to ether the company has value and whether the drug has a market.
It would have been fantastic had the trial started in Winter. I’d have been over the moon. It seems unlikely that will happen because the company would have stated Q1 if they were confident but it’s not impossible, just unlikely. So we are left to consider Spring onwards and the NHS data show us 8k patients attend ER with acute respiratory infections in each month during spring, summer. So we have a potential pool of 40k patients from which to select a couple of hundred.
Thats why all the fuss today is amusing. Why would any long term holder fight against positive recruitment data that is undeniably correct coming from the NHS
Spacman
You really are a rather sad poster. You appear from nowhere claiming a SPAC will value the company at 1-2bn and you end with a suggestion the company should sell up for 200m.
Your fantasy posts couldn’t hit a nerve if you tried
“The numbers you quote can quadruple but until they can be linked back to our drug it’s all just guess work”
It’s amazing how many posters today are getting overly energised in playing down the relevance of the NHS numbers.
Most LTH will be glad to know the NHS data shows sufficient numbers exist throughout the year and it’s a fairly obvious point that the purpose of the trial is to link them to our drug
The board is just infested with day traders pretending to be LTH who tell us infections and hospital data doesn’t matter.
You couldn’t make it up unless you’re Doc D who clearly does make it up but forgets what he posted a week earlier
It’s all part of the traders game
Calm down TP
We don’t need you to comment on every post you feel is irrelevant to your investment, which is slightly bizarre thing to be doing.
Perhaps you should do some research and post relevant information that we can all appreciate as LTH’s
Data showing monthly infection rates for acute respiratory infection over a period when our trial will be running is absolutely useful to investors.
Particularly when posters like yourself are trying to claim it’s irrelevant.
Your argument makes little sense but I see you’re back to we haven’t had an update in 117 days.
The only important update is the start date of the trial. If the company knew the exact date right now, what would be the point of withholding that information from shareholders. There is no point so it’s clear the company are working on all aspects of preparing the trial and when they have that news they will update us.
But keep banging out the same tune TP. I’m not expecting an update until there’s something important to tell us.
“ When will you begin to understand that it is not about the infections/hospitalisations data”
Wow I thought a trial was designed specifically to show benefit using infections and hospital data.
They’re out in force today trying to down play NHS data
You’d think any genuine investor would be reassured that patients are available throughout the year but apparently not. I seems this data must be buried at all costs (no pun intended)