Member Info for Toffers

Didn't happen assumedly, as they didn't rns that it had happened at all, I think I raised it a few weeks ago from recollection.

Https://www.theguardian.com/business/2023/dec/11/miner-anglo-american-could-become-takeover-target-say-analysts

GM402? the newcomer on the block? but not such a newcomer in reality!

Removed my post?

Nice find wiseoil, appreciated :)

But neither of you answer the question, WHAT ARE THEY SELLING EXACTLY? the company has never clarified it either!

Is usually seen as a positive. The sp was probably held down for the sake of that transaction and will hopefully regain a positive trajectory tomorrow.

"Shares of Glencore plc (LON:GLEN – Get Free Report) have received an average recommendation of “Moderate Buy” from the nine ratings firms that are currently covering the company, MarketBeat Ratings reports. One equities research analyst has rated the stock with a hold recommendation and eight have given a buy recommendation to the company. The average 12-month price target among brokers that have updated their coverage on the stock in the last year is GBX 583.89 ($7.38).

A number of equities research analysts have issued reports on the company. JPMorgan Chase & Co. reiterated a “not rated” rating on shares of Glencore in a research note on Thursday, November 9th. Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft restated a “buy” rating and set a GBX 560 ($7.07) price objective on shares of Glencore in a research note on Thursday, September 28th."

source: americanbankingnews.com

So far no one has answered! Funny that! You can't sell something you don't own!

I added 20k in cash more this morning. Glencore's a survivor :)

"Fossil fuel production in 2030 is expected to be more than double what would be necessary to keep global warming under 1.5 degrees, a recent report from several scientific institutions, including the UN Environment Programme, found. That report used scenarios laid out by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the International Energy Agency (IEA) to reach its conclusion."

https://edition.cnn.com/2023/12/03/climate/cop28-al-jaber-fossil-fuel-phase-out/index.html

Yep, multi talented! it's kind of you to acknowledge it :)

I was going to reply to Jiffy,but it looks as though all the comments have been taken down. Anyhow, thought I'd post this anyway for you Jiffy, in Morgan Housel's Same as Ever book, he refers to the Battle of the Bulge (not weight related!), which was one of Americas deadliest military escapdes. 19000 US soldiers were killed and over 70000 wounded or missing, but the Germans didn't have enough troops to mount a successful counter attack, and the US relied on this to their cost, as the uS generals overlooked how unhinged Hitler had become. He wasn't rational and was living in his own world, detached from reality and reason so it is claimed. So the US got all their planning to a T for the war, but didn't bank on the extent to which Hitler had lost his mind. As one of the aide's said, "If we were fighting reasonable people, they would have surrendered long ago."

Can anyone tell me please how HL are showing I am over 2k up with the same share price quoted on my iphone but over £300 down on my PC with the same share price? what is going on?

DO, thank you for coming to my defence :) is Costa the Italian case regarding shares in an electricity company or something? I vaguely remember it, it's so long ago, and that the ruling was the EC law prevails for all member states? Is it that one? I daren't tell you which one sticks out in my mind, because the rabblement will have a field day with it! Always 'bananas' on here!

By the way, my brother went to St Chads! Been to Durham many a time in my teenage years! Great place.

Dattabase, I'm still waiting for your answer on what the company is selling precisely?

As for european law, I passed a paper in european law years ago, which is probably far more than you have done dattabase!

Peace, did they claim damages or not? come on you tell me? did you see it on the amended pleadings? it is there in black and white.

Therefore if they won on the first argument of having the certificates replaced, they would be entitled to damages, and also costs, which they also claimed, from recollection points 5 and 6 on the claim within the amended particulars of claim.

They chose to settle so the case was not heard, that is their choice, what arrangement they came to about damages and costs we will never know, just as we don't know about what they paid to the Logiks because it wasn't made public, and there are certain parts of the tomlin order that haven't been made public also.

Del, and I'm only addressing this to Del, there may be a small window of opportunity for redress, but I don't know as yet. However, I'm not prepared to entertain anyone else here on it, not yet, and even then, it would be a select few, but if per chance I do find out that there might be a small window of opportunity of reclaiming some losses, do you have a twitter account or anything where we can DM and speak privately?

Seamus., I think most of us have the measure of you.

Summit, when have they ever been honest with genuine investors? when? I'm sick and tired of you following me around like a lost dog and trying to discredit me, you and peace are in the same league, the waste bin.