Member Info for Toffers

There's no shorts shown for HE1 on shorttracker so any that are here, are very small time, and that's why they are so desperate to try and get out knowing there is a risk of an rns tomorrow or early next week, and they might be trapped. Well, perhaps we can trap them some more before the company does it? :)

Zoffy, watch the last presentation, they were asked about another placing, and they said no, they are likely to go for debt finance if they go it alone, if they go the JV route, then whoever JV's with them will pick up the tab. Listen to the presentation and educate yourself instead of fabricating matters for the benefit of those who sent you here.

We could get one tomorrow, which will catch the rats out!

Historically most rns updates with the company have been at 7am, but this one caught my eye which was delivered intraday, and I wonder if they will do the same with EWT results to catch some out?

"17 Jan 2022 13:00

RNS Number : 7004Y

Helium One Global Ltd

17 January 2022

Helium One Global Ltd

("Helium One" or "the Company")

Remote Sensing Identifies Multiple Additional Helium Anomalies

Helium One Global (AIM: HE1), the primary helium explorer, is pleased to announce the completion of a multispectral satellite spectroscopy study which has identified multiple additional surface helium anomalies at Rukwa, Eyasi and Balangida (100%) project areas........"

Again, for those who can't be bothered to read the link, here is an important part from it;

"We show that sections of the Tanzanian East African Rift contain most, if not all, of the prerequisites for an economic helium province. Noble gas data from gas seeps in the west and east branches of the Tanzanian section of the East African Rift System contain 4He concentrations of up to 10.5%. This, combined with the potential 4He generated by the Tanzanian Craton and surrounding mobile belts of c. 7.0 × 105 BCF (2 × 1013 m34He (STP)), implies that even with inefficient release, migration and trapping, these regions could provide high-helium concentration reservoirs. In the region of the Rukwa Basin independent prospective resource estimates undertaken on behalf of the operator and their financial backers suggest that there is a P50 (best estimate) of 138 BCF 4He (2.78 × 109 m34He (STP)) potentially trapped within existing trapping structures (Helium One Global 2020), which, if recoverable, would alone supply the current world consumption for 14 years."

Https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/pg/article/28/2/petgeo2021-029/610750/The-principles-of-helium-exploration

The link I posted is FACT Sharebel, it states "Global Helium’s gas samples from the 10-08 well showed helium concentrations 0.56% – 0.68%, which meets the threshold for commercial viability."

I've seen nothing from you to counter commercial viability by way of FACTUAL EVIDENCE. Please now provide and we can all study it.

In case no one read the link,

"Canada’s Global Helium has reported helium concentrations of 0.56% – 0.68% at its Beaverhill Lake zone in Alberta, representing a low but commercially viable concentration.

The 10-08 well production was tested at around 4.1 million cubic feet per day at 3,500 kilopascal flowing tubing pressure from the Beverhill Lake formation over a four-day extended test.

Global Helium’s gas samples from the 10-08 well showed helium concentrations 0.56% – 0.68%, which meets the threshold for commercial viability."

Https://www.gasworld.com/story/global-helium-reports-commercially-viable-helium-concentrations/2139133.article/

Sharebel, obviously there are risks, there is with everything, even just getting out of bed in the morning, but when you look at probabilities, they've already flowed 4.7% to surface, and as I shared a link a while back from memory, a lot less has been considered viably commercial elsewhere, so on the balance of probabilities that I would make it out of bed this morning, which I did, thank heavens, the balance of probabilities here is that they will likely increase that 4.7% and that therefore it will be considered commercially viable. The question is how they then get it out for production purposes as that will take more money and expertise, but by then, the likelihood is they will probably have to go the JV route, and I suspect SLB are not there for nothing. I suspect SLB will get part of a JV thus we won't be charged for this part of the operations at the end of the day, that's what I'm imagining could happen, so they will bring the technology expertise, and someone else will bring in funding and manpower. Technology is very much more sophisticated these days, rather like in the way xray machines evolved in to ultrasound scanners and so on, they can pin point with very much more accuracy where this stuff is embedded. Just my views, but on the balance of probabilities, they can't return less than the 4.7% already flowed, the question is what is actually deemed as commercially viable? as I'm sure others have been deemed commercially viable on less than the 4.7%

Let's go for 9p, the van has it, the van has it! 9p on EWT! :)

Hi Atisha how the devil are you? still holding for the moment, although nicely in profit, but riding the wild west that is AIM! How are you doing?

Even Tilly is producing the 9! It's definitely a good luck symbol from that van! :)

"AIM is regulated by the LSE in its capacity as a Recognised Investment Exchange. AIM companies are bound by the AIM Rules for Companies not the Listing Rules. "

McN that's what I've just said, the assets are out of the jurisdiction so little chance of securing any of those if anything goes wrong, same with any monies invested by the company out of the jurisdiction here but whilst trading here, they are bound by the AIM rules and regs, but as I say, we all know they mean naff all protection wise.

Yes, they have to if they want to trade shares within our jurisdiction, so within the jurisdiction they are bound by the AIM rules and regs, problem is we all know how naff those are!

The problem is, UK authorities can't stop a British company from investing it's funds wherever it likes, so any funds invested offshore is untouchable by shareholders, as are any assets held out of the jurisdiction, it's impossible to restrain them and secure them

MCN, they are registered as a UK company at companies house

https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11120502

therefore AIM rules and regulations must surely apply as per the regulatory handbook

Just looking back at the eurasians history, at 27 March 2020 the sp was 0 (due to suspension), July 13 it was 18.5p, and 8 December it was 40.2p (it's highest).

What got it motoring?

On 1 July there was an rns regarding statement re formal sale process - in similar vein, could we get one about EWT and then JVs?

then it continued to rise on the next rns regarding licences- likewise, we expect news on further licences

and then it rose again on an rns for general update and institutional placing

My betting is we're going to be steered through a similar trajectory. Let's see :)

Ahh Baron, I spot a 9!!!! :)