Member Info for Timster

It means phase 1a could have some more seriously impressive efficacy results.

On rocky ground?

No way, I revoke my post!!

"Why the ambiguity if not?"

This is Avacta 😄

Great sleuthing, does appear he's a very good asset to have with you at AACR. Let's hope Avacta have some side meetings lined up to discuss license options.

Horrible disease 😔

I'll get in first, is she on the 2w trial ? Is it us?

Keep up, late trades 100k (well on the bell)

As was mentioned yesterday it could be easier to recruit patients in the UK because of the NHS and because geographically the cancer centers being used cover the whole of England.

Excellent information, thanks all.

We need a Paul hill interview 😜

Project optimus does seem like the most obvious driver to be fair.

Thanks I found this paper interesting too

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4976787/

It's been discussed by why add this step. Especially when no MTD has been found.

I understand it's to increase participants numbers and start to test efficacy. But that's what phase 2 is isn't it.

Which is the answer

he's taking the **** out of you , just explained what parallel means 😄

i'd say synchronous and asynchronous.

Even Derek might understand that analogy. How thick is the wire frame? Is that also having an effect on the rate of meltage?

The poster should be pretty special to be fair, with the case studies of efficacy observed so far in a safety and tolerability study.

What colour did Al paint the drawing room in his house we paid for.

That's a big old list of big farmers they've all worked for between them.

Please.... No vox interview...