Member Info for thetriplestar

It would be hard for Lorna to do this as she be mates with him wouldn't want to break his heart you know.... plus they in it together - a bit like Keir & Rachel.

Interesting situation unfolding at Physiomics today that highlights a broader AIM governance theme.

A major shareholder there has requisitioned a General Meeting after building a meaningful stake, citing concerns that the share count expanded dramatically over time without corresponding shareholder value creation. Regardless of the outcome, it shows how dilution can eventually become a focal point when investors feel the equity base has grown faster than the value delivered.

Not saying the situations are identical, but it’s a useful case study for any small-cap where funding strategy relies heavily on equity issuance. At some point, markets start asking whether capital raises are translating into per-share progress, not just operational headlines.

For companies transitioning from exploration into commercial execution, capital structure matters just as much as geology or science. Investors ultimately look for value creation on a per-share basis.

It’s a rare feat for an AIM-listed junior to actually make the jump to producer. Most stay in the "exploration loop" forever. By picking a turnkey project like Raglan, they’ve bypassed years of construction and went straight to the "pay dirt." The fact that you're seeing photos of them hitting bedrock suggests they are in the "final inch" of the process where the real money is made.

The concern regarding the $4 million annual administrative costs is grounded in the company’s FY2025 figures, but it overlooks the major structural changes that have occurred since. By October 2025, Helium One effectively wiped its debt by converting over £7.8 million of loan notes into equity, leaving the company debt-free and significantly reducing the interest-related cash drain. The claim that the company is currently "broke" ignores the £6.13 million cash buffer and the healthy Quick Ratio of 6.19 reported in early 2026. Most importantly, the company has pivoted from a pure "cash burner" to a producer; as of the March 5, 2026 RNS, the Colorado (Galactica) project is now filling tube trailers for sale on the spot market. At current helium prices, this production provides a non-dilutive revenue stream that directly offsets administrative burn, extending the current cash runway beyond 18 months.

Regarding the "tens of millions" needed for Rukwa, your post assumes Helium One intends to fund the development alone via a share raise. This ignores the Strategic Farm-out process launched on February 16, 2026. The specific purpose of a farm-out is to bring in a "Tier-1" industry partner who provides the heavy capital investment (CAPEX) for drilling and plant construction in exchange for a stake in the project. This is the industry-standard way to develop world-class discoveries without punishing retail shareholders with massive dilution. The decline in share price from 2.5p to 0.5p is largely a symptom of the 9 billion share count created during the 2023-2024 survival phase, not a reflection of current asset value. With a 9.2% concentration discovery and active production in the US, the board is negotiating from a position of "Revenue and Assets," not "Desperation.

If you’re still saying there’s 'no money in the bank,' you haven’t read the audited reports or the Oct 2025 RNS. Helium One is debt-free after converting £7.8M in loans and entered 2026 with a £6.13M war chest.

That cash isn't just sitting idle—it's backed by a Quick Ratio of 6.19, one of the healthiest in the junior mining sector. On top of that, as of March 5th, we are officially in the 'Revenue Phase' with Colorado trailers selling into a spot market where prices are spiking toward $1,000/Mcf. The company isn't broke; it’s finally funded, producing, and holding all the cards in the farm-out negotiations. Silence from the Board isn't a lack of cash—it's the legal blackout of a major deal being finalized.

People are panicking that the 0.59p price gives the farm-out partner too much leverage. Let’s get real: a Tier-1 Major doesn't value a 9.2% helium discovery based on a retail ticker; they value it based on the NPV of the gas.

Lorna is quiet because AIM Rule 11 says she has to be. The real leverage isn't the share price—it's the fact that we have £6M in the bank and trailers rolling in Colorado. We aren't desperate for a raise, which means we can walk away from any bad offer. The silence isn't a lack of interest; it's a legal requirement of being in the big leagues

There is no problem being long or short in a stock - thats what this is all about - each to their own with their own research - you have to respect that Cocobean, really you need to understand that everyone has a different view on this stock.

The only time a low share price is a "weakness" is if the company is broke and needs to raise cash.

Old HE1: In 2023, a low share price was a disaster because they had to "print" billions of shares at 0.2p just to keep the lights on.

New HE1: Because of the Colorado (Galactica) revenue and the £6.1M cash pile, the Board has the "luxury of time." They aren't negotiating as a beggar; they are negotiating as a producer.

It is a common myth that a low share price makes a farm-out deal worse. In reality, a Tier-1 partner (like a Major oil & gas firm) doesn't care about the 0.59p share price.

They Value the Molecules: They look at the Net Present Value (NPV) of the helium in the ground. Whether the stock is 0.5p or 5p, the value of 9.2% concentration helium remains the same to an engineer at a Major.

Capital vs. Equity: In a farm-out, the partner usually pays for the drilling and plant (CAPEX) in exchange for a percentage of the project, not a percentage of the company shares. Therefore, the daily ticker price is almost irrelevant to the contract terms.

Under AIM Rule 11 and the Market Abuse Regulation (MAR), a company in active negotiations for a "Price Sensitive" deal (like a farm-out) enters a legal "Quiet Period."

The Constraint: If Lorna goes on a podcast and says, "Our share price is too low, we are worth way more," it could be seen as market manipulation—trying to artificially inflate the price to help negotiation leverage.

The Penalty: Doing this can lead to an immediate suspension of the stock or heavy fines from the FCA. The Board must wait until the deal is "Binding" before they can shout about it from the rooftops.

COCOBEAN have you actually taken out a SHORT position on ECR? I would be keen to know as will follow how much cash you make on your predictions should you win. I have a long position based on my own assessments - so let's see what happens!

Days like this are designed to make you panic. If there's no RNS saying "We lost the rig" or "The well is dry," then this is just market noise. The 0.55p-0.60p range has historically been a strong floor.

The fundamentals haven't changed:

The Predator 220 rig is still on-site.

The 9.2% discovery is still in the ground.

The Colorado trailers are still being filled.

The Qatar supply gap is still 30% wide.

Don't let a 0.1p move in price blind you to a 10p vision. The silence from the Board means the big deal is still in the oven. Turn off the 1-minute chart and watch the RNS feed.

It's one thing to read an RNS about "Phase 1 Mine Plans," but seeing Black Gravels on Green Shales is the physical proof that the plan is based on reality. It confirms that the 1.5m depth target ECR mentioned in February isn't just a guess—it's the actual thickness of the "pay zone." If they are hitting this consistently, the 938oz target starts to look very conservative.

Saw a photo from the digging at Raglan and the layer sequence looked interesting — black clays, orange/yellow clays, then into red and black gravels sitting on bedrock (green/shales). That’s pretty much what you’d expect to see in a working alluvial system. The clays are just overburden, but once you’re into the gravels that’s where the gold tends to sit, especially as you get closer to the bedrock contact. That bottom layer is usually where the heavier material settles over time. If they’re consistently seeing that full sequence, it suggests the system is intact and they’re getting down into the right zones rather than just scratching around near surface.

The mention of Green Shales/Bedrock is particularly exciting for Raglan. In central Queensland, these are often part of the Curtis Island Group or similar ancient sedimentary formations.

• The Trap: When the bedrock is shale, it often stands on edge or has "ribs." These ribs act like natural sluice box riffles in the river, catching gold for thousands of years.

• The Evidence: ECR's recent site analysis (Feb 10, 2026) targeted a 1.5m depth. If the bedrock is showing at that depth, it means the "heavy lift" of stripping overburden is minimal, and they are into the "wash" (the gold-bearing gravels) almost immediately.

Since Au Gold Corp has just closed its A$2M fundraise to accelerate drilling, do you think ECR is positioning itself for a smart “wait-and-see” play? By the time the first A$1M royalty milestone is triggered, the drill results should already be public, giving ECR a clear choice: take the cash or convert into equity if AUGC delivers a standout discovery. Could this “legacy” royalty effectively be a de-risked call option — preserving downside while keeping the potential to multiply value using house funds as AUGC does the heavy lifting?

They will probably RNS the off take agreement at the same time as telling us how much gold they have dug up in the month of March -

Re the A$2M royalty assignment to Au Gold Corp, it’s worth stepping back and looking at the strategy behind it. This isn’t just about waiting for milestone payments — it’s about optionality and risk management. ECR doesn’t need to choose today between cash or equity; it can wait while AUGC does the heavy lifting on exploration. AUGC has just raised fresh capital and is actively advancing the Victorian assets, which means the geological and execution risk sits with them. By the time the first A$1M milestone is triggered through a defined Mineral Resource, the “blind” exploration risk is largely removed and the drill data will be public. At that point, ECR can make an informed decision: take the cash, which provides non-dilutive funding for its own projects, or convert into equity if AUGC has delivered a standout discovery and strong market momentum. That’s not speculation — it’s investing with far more certainty and potentially using effectively “house money” to gain upside exposure. If results are average, ECR simply banks the cash. If results are exceptional, the equity route offers leveraged upside. In practical terms, ECR has outsourced the cost and risk of exploration while retaining flexibility over the payoff structure. It’s a structure designed to preserve capital, limit downside, and keep meaningful upside on the table.

An easy half million quid for that buyer at 50k -