RE: GGP11 Jun 2020 07:47
ZZOOZZZOORR
You havent answered my previous questions, but I'll do you the courtesy as this is an interesting look at how to present drill results. But do bear in mind this is the SOLG site.
Also to start with, I don't predict anything re GGP. I am simply making statements from what I see.
Shall we take the 59 (the best result so far re ) infill drill.
HAD059 returned: ? 109m @ 6.3g/t Au and 0.71% Cu from 668m ? including 55.4m @ 11g/t Au and 0.79% Cu from 676.1m ? including 4m @ 78g/t Au and 1.2% Cu from 718m
On face value it looks great ! (not half a billion MCAP great for a minority percent but great).
However the real killer is the 4m @78g from 718m, this is inc in the 55.4m at 676m and inc in the 109m a 668m.
so the 668m to 777m has an avg of 6.3g/t
The rest is just stats, if you've got a 4m vein system which is very high grade it will push up the 55m and the 109m massively.
The 4m vein could be 2m at 150g, we are simply not told.
Normally this would be pretty good if at say 100m depth. But when you have to go down over half a km to try and trace a few metres of high grade vein which might vary massively in size and content its not great, far from it.
If you look at the detail of the grades they arnt as good as Lundin for example.
Nothing is bad, but my suggestion would be to keep your feet on the ground and really look at how a high grade intercept can manipulate results.