Member Info for Theeeeduke

Mr 6246250 learnt a quick lesson ….lol

Ha ha the sceptic in me saying a few small buys after bell fry and lure in the crowd, doesn’t look like it’s working - Once bitten twice shy and all that - Or in RRR’s case 20 times bitten ……lol.

Any selling and and could well see trades below 0.06 today ! If there is a placing going to land dread to think what price it might be at 🙈🙈🙈🙈

Hahahaha ANOTHER REACH RNS - HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA !!!!

The neck on them, absolutely nothing new in that RNS what so ever in my opinion, some would say purely put out to suck in people to get the placing away !

Banbury - With all "news" long winded posts trying to make himself look clever, or superior than us, looks like he though Paul Johnson was still in charge at POW - So back tracking on his comment now . . lol

Yes - When Helpful spouts figures hopefully everyone now takes them with a pinch of salt ! Large pinch of slat at that !

Resigned about a year ago I believe !

And news - I don’t think Paul I’m in charge at POW anymore !

News - You have obviously invested or have a vested interest in the share price improving from here ! If you have invested you are obviously down on your investment, which is not nice to see for anyone. Whilst I agree with what you say in one sense, if Andrew Bell/RRR has managed to get money for RRR through another means other than a placing then great ! But if it has not been RNS’d and people do not know about it, then we can only go off what we know - DRC money hasn’t arrived, cash burn can be calculated using accounts, plus some with BF costs from last RNS, if no other source of funding announced one can only presume a placing is very near, and a large one on that. Not trying to scare anyone but that’s the only logical thought process if your judgement os based on past history and all information in the public domain !

Anyone else think smallyus is bopd ???

Had a few beers - Ignore me ….lol

By far highest volume day I’ve seen on GS20

$7 million in ETH 👌😳

And just like that the conundrum is solved !

It doesn’t state dollars on the monetary volume stated, which is why it hasn’t been changed !

AHS - I think the figures trades are correct also, it’s just uncanny how the total volume of traded coins transferred to $’s is 100x all of the time ! Simple answer would be this volume is given in cents not dollars - Again just a thought

fair point fella, i’m not gonna lie i **** a brick after last earnings and sold, missing out on massive rise in mara. almost bought in today at $22.5 but didn’t pull trigger, if i’d see. sailors announcement i would have ! not gonna lie i thought btc peak on this cycle was mid 2025, so got caught napping - think the etfs may have changed the whole nature of the cycle now, so i’m scratching my head at moment ! i had kr1 as my crypto play but again etfs have given btc more straight and dominance over the alt’s, so even kr1 i’m finding unpredictable at moment ! myself and chaebol decided to go big on gst, worth taking a look fella, benefits more on btc volatility than price rise ! at this moment in time this cycle not working any where near as well for me as the last one, and if i’d listened to chaebol early in the last cycle i wouldn’t have to worry about this one ….lol

do miss being in the miners tho as by god there’s no better rush and why we play the game ! i wonder if that phone box in dickens county with my name on is still there ….lol

News - Haven’t read all your post, but what’s your thoughts on this ?

Many myself included post that a pacing is highly likely to occur, our (well at mine at least) basis for this OPINION is due to the company’s history over the past 15 plus years, plus the fact that looking at all RNS’s including final results, along with no DRC money yet, one can only believe the company is starting to run low on cash and will need some soon - If no DRC money ! If we get told to lawyer up because of this, is it possible Andrew Bell should be told to lawyer up for saying this is being shorted ? Even more so if he has said it is being shorted by MM’s , if he has said this with no proof ? I’m not sure of the exact words he said but hypothetically do I have a point ??

Your thoughts on the below Lloyd, I think you can work out the typos (auto spell ..lol)

So if you divide 1,337,966,178 by 100 you get 13 379 661

Diversity de this by 204 = 65 586

This to me says 204 bitcoin trades on the exchange at an average price of $65 586

I could be totally wrong but it’s been like this for months so makes sense to me

BTC/USDTLast Price : 63,638.00000000Change : -0.05%24 High : 69,000.0000000024 Low : 59,000.0000000024 Volume : 1,337,966,178.71545430

Name Last Price 24H Change 24H High 24H Low 24H Volume

BTC $63,540.1 -0.05% $69,000 $59,000 204.326

Name Last Price 24H Change 24H High 24H Low 24H Volume

BTC $63,686.1 -0.05% $69,000 $59,000

Roger - This is something I alluded to around about the same time as sunny side did when it was hot topic of discussion. When you look at the home page where it shows the amount/volume of BTC traded, I think this is the correct figure. When you go on to the exchange BTC page, the monetary value of the total trades seems to be exactly 100 x of the home page - So in one way I believe that is good, as it shows the volume of BTC etc traded as being correct - Just makes you ask why is the monetary value on the BTC page 100 x it