Ryan Mee, CEO of Fulcrum Metals, reviews FY23 and progress on the Gold Tailings Hub in Canada. Watch the video here.
When will they have to issue a TR1
It was cancelled reverse trade just appeared 1,250,000.00
Big sell from Friday 1,250,000.00 just appeared. 4.05
Novum Securities and Optiva Securities are acting as Joint Brokers and placing agents to the Company.
750k shares bought at 4.20 just appeared
I agree Bob a very low rsi and oversold expect a very strong move up
Take advantage of the impatient a small top up at 4.98
Thank you zebra appreciate your post
The Option is to 31 January 2020, unless otherwise mutually agreed by the Parties, to allow for negotiation and execution of a legally binding Rig Contract.
The Rig Option Agreement provides for a rig mobilisation date within a window commencing 15 March 2020 and ending 30 April 2020 unless otherwise agreed by mutual consent of the Parties.
The rns clearly states unless mutally agreed the option will be executed on the 31 St of January so they must of agreed to a extension on both sides for further talks would a rns to inform the markets that the negotiation are still on going have been appropriate or of any value having already stated that negotiations could go past the 31st ?
The Cascadura production test results represent a dramatic change for Touchstone, as it confirms the monumental resource potential of the Ortoire exploration block. from the touchstone RNs this morning
The Orortoire block is north of Predator oil Trinity location
Totally agree it's a disgrace 31,935. bought 22,845 sold and they drop the bid price .20 yesterday 109,741 bought no sells bid price rise (zero)
The Option is to 31 January 2020, unless otherwise mutually agreed by the Parties, to allow for negotiation and execution of a legally binding Rig Contract.
The Rig Option Agreement provides for a rig mobilisation date within a window commencing 15 March 2020 and ending 30 April 2020 unless otherwise agreed by mutual consent of the Parties.
From malcys blog
Columbus as operator has this morning announced that CO2 has been successfully been injected at the Trinity Innis field, onshore Trinidad. This is incredibly good news for Predator, indeed one should call it a very important operational milestone for the company
Why such a small share price rise ?
100% agree market maker spooked a few weak holders because the MM are desperately short of shares to sell
250k sell at 6p
The Barchart Technical Opinion rating is a 72% Buy with a Strongest short term outlook on maintaining the current direction.just released
Sell gone through for 6.16
Why are buys showing as sells?/There are more buys and than sells and the share price is falling!
One question that is regularly thrown around on bulletin boards, for the stocks and shares is "Why is my buy showing as a sell?" or "Why is my sell showing as a buy?".
The simple answer to this is that buys are showing as sells and vice versa, because the algorithm used to determine these trades is outdated and decidedly more useless than it would have been thirty years or more ago:
Effectively, a trade is given a "Buy" or "Sell" status depending upon which side of the mid point price of the Bid/Ask spread the trade lands on.
e.g.
Bid= 2p
Mid Point= 3p
Ask= 4p
My trade is filled at a price of 3.1p and is therefore shown as a "Buy" by the system.
Now, errors occur because the actual Bid/Ask spreads at market prices aren't necessarily the same as those that are "officially" listed and used by the algorithm.
I would add, that as more firms are making markets and as brokerages become more price competitive, we've seen a gradual tightening of spreads over the past thirty years, which is the cause of this problem.
When market spreads are nice and wide, this system does actually work accurately, with a smaller level of error.
Linked to this is the phenomenon of this system showing a stock as having more "Buy" trades than "Sell" trades and still falling in price:
In the case of market orders, this happens because because smaller trades (often the case in stocks with small market capitalisations - you can't get the liquidity for large trades meaning only small players exist in the market) tend not to cause large swings in the market Bid/Ask prices, but smaller moves instead.
e.g.
Bid= 2p
Mid Point= 3p
Ask= 4p
My market "Sell" trade goes through at 2.75p (it is below the Mid Point of 3p and therefore shows as a "Sell").
The system then registers the Ask Price ticking down to 3p.
Bid= 2p
Mid Point= 2.5p
Ask= 3p
My next market "Sell" trade goes through at 2.70p (this is now above the Mid Point of 2.5p and therefore shows as a "Buy" even though in reality it was a sell).
This all works in reverse too, making "Buy" trades look like "Sell" trades.
Generally speaking (certainly not always), if a stock is going down, it's going to be because the market is selling more of it than they are buying. Now, this isn't always the case and sometimes with stocks traded by SEAQ you may see market maker tactics used to fill orders that aren't visible on the order book - tree shaking.
Finally, there's a certain irony in that for the more liquid stocks in the market, the ratio of buys to sells can often be reversed to give an accurate impression of the "real" buys vs sells.
Shares bought from Monday to Friday
Buys one million one hundred and seventy two thousand three hundred and seventy two
Shares sold three hundred and ninety six thousand three hundred and four
Bid price rise .10
Sell gone through at 5.90 150k