Charles Jillings, CEO of Utilico, energized by strong economic momentum across Latin America. Watch the video here.
Don’t knock it toffers is definitely not in my green bin, I love a evening yarn and it never disappoints 🤣
A sherry or two to follow perhaps 🍷
Pay for the Ukraine?
Are you not aware Zelensky already signed a deal for a rebuild…..with Blackrock!
That aside who and how is anyone going to force Russia pay for any rebuild?
LaLa land but nowt new in the world of neghead
🎪
No one was stopping you buying EUA at any price toffers just as no one is stopping you conducting research to try and find another potential multi-bagger?
If you spent as much time putting your energy into some positive aspect of investment or ‘studying cyber crime’ instead of complaining to the ‘FCA about the company’ 🤥 you might find you have more positive and lucrative result instead of hanging around here like an old harridan?
🎪
🤡🤡🤡
'Those with capacity to invest should ensure they are in receipt of relevant emotional capacity and resilience. :-)'
HaHa...how true :)
In regards to 'sunken costs' I do not see how anyone could sensibly forecast anything in that regard considering,
- We do not know what is being sold
- We do not know if the assets are being sold as one to a single buyer/multiple buyers
- Or if the assets are being sold seperately to multiple buyers
- For what price seperate assets / all assets
- CS informed us at the AGM 'no deal is the same'
- We do not know how the Russian authorities would view such a sale
The comparisons to any other miner sold in Russia are too vague until we understand the details of any potential deal (assuming one is forthcoming) IMO?
Apologies for spelling and format in a rush as off out.
Someone wrote a interesting update in regards to the DD process yesterday which was a general guide not specific
to any company or EUA?
In reagards to EUA itself would love to knw the answers to DD but accept I am not going to know until - it's signed off or not as the case may be?
Do you think the ‘several parties’ are new since the last RNS or they have been interested since FSP (or the Hammond tweet) - either or?
What stage(s) do you think these parties are at with their DD? - anywhere from start to finish?
Do you think the company that completed DD is still interested? - from the time of AGM the answer would be yes
If the original buyer is still at the table I would think further DD would be relevant to the 'resulting improvement in value to potential purchasers'?
How long should this take for the original buyer to further evaluate and consider an offer?
I am not expert on this but considering/assuming they have already performed DD on the previous data referenced (FS) then I would think weeks rather than
months and months? Happy to be corrected if anyone has more knowledge on this process?
Remember well the detractors claiming EUA had no resources of value and would never attract a buyer?
For a company devoid of resource and worthless as claimed, the several parties conducting DD appear to rather contradict that narrative?
'Our focus on BRICS non-sanctioned counterparties continues, with several parties currently at various stages of their due diligence.'
'The Board expects the concentrates to be sold at carrying value and we are currently evaluating offers from three parties who responded to the tender process'
For some reason they appear to think WK has shut down despite being presented with multiple observations of expanded clearing work and confirmation of the dragline process currently deployed?
That’s our M&A mining and business gurus Bill & Rick for ya!
Get selling LTH’s cos these guys are all over it 🤣
🎪
'that's why they're not doing anything, it's not worth their while to do anything, and they will have been advised of that, I'm sure.'
The are performing a considerable amount of work we have seen the clearings and the amount of soil the excavator is working through.
My Lord, how obtuse can you be?
' Eurasia did in March 2015, they had interested parties in MT they said even then!'
Totally different context potential interest is totally different to 'trying to sell' it's not that you do not understand the value creation post FS DFS and considerable associated work and the further partnerships EUA created either?
Like many, your desperate for it to fail for whatever warped reason of that it's clear.
“Why would Eurasia halt mining metals at WK?”
We have seen via LB's satallite imagery (thanks again LB) clearing for mining has anything but stopped it's expanded over a wide area, this is being prep'd for a serious amount of work.
We also see the dragline in action digging through a large swathe of land and piling ready for washing.
Do the negheads really think all this activity would be taking place if there were not interested partys at the table?
‘ trying to sell assets since 2015’
WK did not even have a DFS at that stage never mind MT.
Poor effort Pinocchio 🤥
Do you remember when it was insisting the BoD would in no way be able to construct and release an annual report…???
And then they released the annual report 🤣🤣🤣
Walter Mitty 🤥 and neghead clown show 🤡
CS stated at the AGM
‘They are very hopeful of a sale by the end of the year and have reasons for that but cannot tell us anything further due to NDA’s in place’
Anything other is misinformation 🤥
‘ Furthermore, I think those of us who were shareholders at that time’
Yet insisting you were still a shareholder most recently certainly at the time of the AGM (not a squeak)
🐁 🤔
‘It’s a wolf it’s a wolf’ 🤥
Toffers ‘I had a dream’ 🤣
Are you sure it was in court and not the……..
🎪
🤡🤡🤡
Your the one informing the board EUA lost the case just to be clear.
🎪
Declares EUA’s lawyers Simmons and Simmons incapable whilst ignoring the fact Q&M are on their third legal representative for the same case?
🎪