RE: Funding31 Aug 2025 10:26
I get that a company can use shares to grow by successful acquisitions. Melrose being a recent example.
I have number of issues with Nuburu though.
First AZ’s business track record is poor as evidenced by RTOP and SYME failures, he over promises and undelivers on a large scale.
Next he is trying to rescue the old RTOP business which failed and specialised in operational risk in financial institutions and now he claims its has synergies with in the def3nse industry. It doesn’t, it’s simply AZ trying to prove the failed model could work if it has access to more cash and get Nuburu to pay richly for it.
He is trying to the same with SYME another failed business model which he said started back in 2016/17 which regular posters here know all about. You say that no institution will deal with an insolvent business but then ignore the fact that loss making SYME itself has net liabilities and even if all the Nuburu cash arrives and is converted into shares will still have a deficit. Why would any lender lend money via a unproven sub scale loss making platform when the service provider could go bust and it would have to pick up the tab to the do the outsourced processing?
The Nuburu business failed before and without its patents and now only 7 employees I don’t see it as having retained that much know how and thus being able to contribute much to Tekne beyond cash funding via dilutive share issues.
Nuburu starts life as effective shell with a balance deficit which means huge dilution just to fix that issue before it even buys Tekne.
Yes defense manufacturing is a hot sector at present but even if AZ can double or treble value of the business, I think the issues mentioned above will mean that current Nuburu shareholders simply won’t benefit in terms of share price appreciation.