RE: Thaiger and Dustyslay2 Jul 2024 03:55
Alright, testpak3, as I've said before, I didn't expect you to even consider what you hear from me. Your world is as straightforward and simplistic as you are. You hear, read, and watch BBC, CNN, and all those other news outlets feeding you the same stories worldwide. And if they all say the same thing, it must be true, right? This is your simple world, and this is what keeps your mind comfortably dull. It doesn't even occur to you to think about why all your mainstream media spout the same things at the same time, with the same tired arguments: conspiracy theorists, Nazis, tin foil hat wearers, etc.
Let me reiterate how painfully simple-minded you are.
Point one:
I quote you:"posted by an intelligent person in the major US media"
Do you see what I mean? You cite an article by someone paid to write what you're supposed to believe. And as simple as you are, you unquestioningly believe it. Yet you conveniently ignore that it's 7 states, not just one. Are all decision-makers in those 7 states nuts? And then you bring up your pilots again, as if in your simple world, pilots are paragons of trust because they can fly a plane. But hey, a simple Google search for "pilots on chemtrails" yields this gem first: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DPnWaBsMYnY
Must be a collective madness, right? Because it doesn't fit your simple worldview.
Point two:
Here we go again, another feeble attempt at deception.
I quote you: "If landings a hoax, why did Russia not expose it.?"
I've shown you that you're wrong, and now you're trying to tell me they'd do it out of patriotism and for money. Your argument is kindergarten-level.
Point three:
And here I quote you again:
"If vaccines a hoax, How many people do you know with Polio, Yellow fever, Rubella,?"
This statement clearly implies that you equate mRNA injections with DNA-altering substances and dead cell vaccines. Apparently, you're so old you can't remember what you're claiming, because now you say, and I quote:
"I did not say MRNA vaccines were equivalent to 'traditional 'dead cell' vaccines."
Okay, and please spare me the spiel that you didn't mean mRNA because that's the only link to conspiracy theories these days.
Point four:
Good grief, how can one be so uncritical?
I'm familiar with your examples of core drillings, but unfortunately, they only tell half the truth, mate. Ever wondered why your MSM always cherry-pick snippets from a specific period in Earth's development? It's simple: if you cut off the ends of a scale or only show select pieces, you can twist your results however you like. It's like showing you the chart for PHE but cropping out everything before 2023. Do you catch my drift? You only get to see what fits the narrative.
As for the rest of your insults, I won't dignify them with a response. As mentioned in my last reply, just stay as you are. Thankfully, all those gullible souls who think MSM tells them the unvarnished truth are gradually dying out.