Member Info for TerrorWit

From LinkedIn - a small signal. Nanoco is recruiting — actively building its R&D team for the summer. That's not the behaviour of a company winding down or running out of cash. It's the behaviour of a company expecting to execute.

🚀 Summer Internship Opportunities – Join Our R&D Team in Runcorn, Cheshire (UK)! 🔬

We’re excited to offer 2x hands-on summer internship opportunities for 2nd or 3rd year university students studying Chemistry or a related scientific discipline.

If you're eager to gain real-world lab experience, we’d love to hear from you.

🧪 R&D Chemistry Summer Intern Opportunity

What you’ll do:

🟠Work in a chemical laboratory within a quantum dot (QD) manufacturing environment

🟠Prepare and test QD samples to support ongoing product development projects

🟠Collaborate with experienced chemists and gain practical lab skills

What we offer:

🟡 Hands-on lab experience

🟡 Training and mentorship from our talented senior chemists

🟡 Exposure to cutting-edge materials and technologies

⚙️ R&D Device Engineering Summer Intern Opportunity

What you’ll do:

🟠Work in a device fabrication laboratory within a QD manufacturing environment

🟠Support the preparation and testing of prototype devices

🟠Operate and maintain laboratory test equipment

🟠Contribute to innovative technology development initiatives

What we offer:

🟡 Practical experience in device engineering and prototyping

🟡 Training on advanced lab equipment

🟡 Training and mentorship from our talented device team

🟡 Opportunity to work on real-world technology challenges

💡 Who should apply?

🟢 2nd or 3rd year undergraduate students with eligibility to work /study in the UK

🟢Studying Chemistry, Materials Science, Physics, Engineering, or a related field

🟢Motivated, curious, and eager to learn

📩 Interested?

Apply now or reach out for more information at hr@nanocotechnologies.com

🔴 Please note, visa sponsorships are unavailable for these opportunities

#Internship #SummerInternship #Chemistry #Engineering #R&D #Students #STEM #quantumdots #qd #qdtechnology #science 🟠

Is that the level of post you find relatable then? Trying to pump the shares based on today’s trading pattern. Would you like to explain how that works with some structured reasoning? You can ask an AI tool to help if you want.

Nanonano has dug up a 10‑month‑old analysis that predicted a higher LG settlement and a sale process. He's using it to argue that the company has underdelivered. But the analysis was always speculative — it was a guest pitch, not company guidance. The fact that the actual outcome differed doesn't prove Nanoco failed; it proves that external predictions are just guesses.

Complaints about style (mine is fine) are just another way to avoid substance.

Dunning‑Kruger is about those who are certain before the evidence or facts. I'm admitting what I don't know — and telling you to listen to the company instead of performing. No one forces you to relate to it.

It Must be disconcerting when, after thousands of posts, new tools like AI can deconstruct your performances instantaneously.

Sarcasm is a shield. It lets us dismiss without engaging, mock without arguing. But it's transparent — a performance to hide the fact that there’s no counter‑argument. We see through it.

I value thoughtful posts where others show genuine experience and better knowledge. I don't mind how they write them or what tools they use — so long as they do their best.

Only those who think their guessed‑at opinions are certainty and facts would object to AI

Interesting performance of outrage.

The need to claim credit for a routine filing is pure performance. Anyone would think the company had never managed its own paperwork before.

There, the reality is that the company published it within a reasonable timeframe, as I said they would.

Today this reads to me that all any of you want is an echo chamber for your own performances.

But it’s a public forum where anyone can post within the rules. Even me.

Meanwhile the phone rings at Nanoco HQ …

“Hello, this is Nanoco. How may I help you?”

Kooba - “I’d like to speak to Liam”

“Let me see if he’s in his office, may I ask who’s calling?”

Kooba - “ yes it’s Kooba, I am an expert in shares off LSE and I’ve got Sammy 88 with me, who is another expert but not as sophisticated and good as me, obviously.”

“ I see Me Kooba sir, please hold the line.”

“Liam I’ve got that Mr Kooba over the line”

Liam - “that’s the fifth time today, what does he want this time?”

“He says he’s got a semi and you’re going to get a fine.”

etc …

Meanwhile the phone rings at Nanoco HQ …

“Hello, this is Nanoco. How may I help you?”

Kooba - “I’d like to speak to Liam”

“Let me see if he’s in his office, may I ask who’s calling?”

Kooba - “ yes it’s Kooba, I am an expert in shares off LSE and I’ve got Sammy 88 with me, who is another expert but not as sophisticated and good as me, obviously.”

“ I see Me Kooba sir, please hold the line.”

“Liam I’ve got that Mr Kooba over the line”

Liam - “that’s the fifth time today, what does he want this time?”

“He says he’s got a semi and you’re going to get a fine.”

Etc..

I suggest you tell him. I’m sure he will be grateful for your superior understanding.

How quickly you all go ad hominem and attack me every time I'm right.

The truth is, you don't like having your inept performances called out. The fact is, the company has done nothing wrong — and you're all barking up another wrong tree like rabid poodles.

Most companies just file an annual confirmation statement giving details of their officers. And - companies House doesn't have its own police force constantly checking on them.

All you're demonstrating is your complete lack of experience directing any business, which I presume is motivated by your dream that despite the company making a formal announcement that a sale is no longer part of it's strategy, there is still some tenous reason why they might be misleading you and you might all suddenly wake up maigically enriched whilst doing nothing to earn it.

Sammy88, you've quoted the law correctly, but you're misreading how it works in practice.

Section 430(2B) says the information must be made available "as soon as reasonably practicable" . That is not a fixed deadline of "immediately." The law explicitly recognises that delays can be reasonable.

The only potential penalty is a fine of "not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale" . For context, that is currently around £1,000 – not a criminal conviction, not director disqualification. It's a minor administrative penalty for persistent failure.

More importantly, the company has already announced its interim results for next Monday. The most logical time to publish the Section 430 statement is alongside those results – not in isolation weeks before. That would be "reasonably practicable."

So the claim that "Liam Gray is in breach of the Companies Act and liable to a fine" is an overstatement. There is no evidence of a breach, and even if there were a delay, the consequences would be minimal. This is administrative paperwork, not a scandal and you are overthinking and performing expertise you do not possess.

By the way ... this title is the true slop:-

"Liam Gray in breach of Companies Act and liable to a fine?"

if you ask any AI it will tell you why in under five seconds

Sammy88 is now digging deeper into governance technicalities — audit committee composition, non‑exec numbers, etc. These are valid points in a governance sense, but they're not existential threats to the company. They can be resolved by board adjustments, which the company has reasonable time to make. He's using them to imply dysfunction, but they're just administrative details.

Sammy can’t refute the substance then.

The company is in execution mode, not transformation mode. The strategy is set: clear the path, run the JDAs, cut costs. They don't need a visionary CEO right now — they need a steady hand to manage the existing strategy. Liam Gray is that steady hand.

Launching a CEO search would be a distraction and a cost. The absence of a search is not a sign of dysfunction; it's a sign of focus.

They will either promote Liam or start the search once the JDAs either execute or fall through. Meanwhile, overthinking — especially a week away from the results — is pointless