Member Info for Tegop

Shorts have infinite risk. And the cost of borrowing makes it hurt even more.

I am confident CINE will post a positive earnings on August and give us a plan for cutting down debts. On the court case side, i have read the appeal and am more confident the three appeals judges will not give an unorthodox or extraordinary decision.

Cine does not need to be 100% of 2019 to be profitable. 85% is the base estimate but not reaching it does not mean the company will go bankrupt.

A cash positive April, May, and June will change the outlook of the company and will deserve a re-rate if CINE no longer needed to add into its debt and start the deleverageing.

I doubt debenhams ever sold movie tickets, popcorns, and sugar water.

The fear of dilution is two years overdone. It did not happen while cinemas were closed, even less likely with business as usual.

You should not use your oracle powers here. Save it of lottery tickets. Can you share your sources of these so called facts?

Be wary of people who are so absolutely sure of things. Cine may still be able to pay debts, win the appeal, and not dilute shareholders.

Cine sells movie tickets, popcorns, and sugar water. Certainly in a much better position than a year ago and things are looking up.

Not really. Cinemas are open and people pay for tickets and popcorn. Business as usual.

Just to be a contrarian, it is also possible that the CINE lawyers were aware of the link and decided that the idea of conflict of interest is immaterial to the case.

Either way, there is little to lose in pointing it out. I remember Investor relations replying to an enquiry about K2 shorting ahead of the results.

" They was no conspiracy. No bias. No corruption. There are valid arguments on both sides but, as I said in the original message, all the posters who think the decisions was obviously wrong or flawed and the appeal will certainly win, have got it wrong. "

Can you confirm who said these statements? Your latest response sounds to juvenile I am now starting to question your maturity.

I was just flabbergasted by his lack of faith in humanity. His mere existence also affects mine. Also, I am bored on Sundays.

You must be so desperate that you side with the disease than with humanity just to sell your narrative.

On the other hand, you underestimate the tenacity and resilience of the already built in technology and protocols to contain pathogens and immunize the public to a threat humanity has defeated centuries ago.

I should remind you that you are in a BB of CINE investors, naturally we are interested in CINE.

However, you are proposing that the judge/decision is impeccable and incorruptible. That the perfect judgement is reached 100% of the time. If that is the case, there should be no point in appeals. The appeal could have been dismissed by the court without hearing if there is no basis to it. But it is moving forward and is on trial.

We are merely adding an inquiry that there may be a mistrial, where someone related to the CINEPLEX board became a judge deciding a merger and acquisition case and therefore may have inclined here judgement one way or another.

Lastly, you are saying 100% of all lawyers on the planet agree on the decision, please read on my previous link posted. It could be you on an echochamber.

It is like a blank cheque awarded to CINEPLEX at the cost of cineworld to be paid in full.

The synergies calculation that the judge accepted is not the only one on the table. Judge conway merely accepted the one that benefited CINEPLEX the most. This is another canadian firm commenting on the issue. I am sure CINEWORLD's appeal lawyers have more answers.

https://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/en-ca/knowledge/publications/7ee6f89b/expectation-damages-for-lost-synergies-a-closer-look-at-the-ontario-superior-courts

@Yuri.F

Or, Lenders can can negotiate with CINE, who they supported through a pandemic and is more and more likely to recover than go bankrupt.

Cine had a positive quarter with just Spiderman. We expect at least 4 giant movies just this summer. Closing of unprofitable sites, opening of new sites, some cost cutting measures, ticket price hikes, 4DX, Imax, etc.

We cannot pretend to understand the company's full finances and future.

If anyone thought this is a 80p stock and does not think this is a bargain at 23p, he should have sold ages ago.

Everyone else can average down until the dust settles.

They agreed to buy plex on the basis that plex will not exceed 750million in debt. CINEPLEX stopped paying landlords to the tune of 200MIllion to keep the deal. That is the ordinary course argument. You are saying "outbreak of illness" frees cineplex from committing to the terms of the deal to begin with?

Also. What do you think of the synergy damages? Why would plex benefit from synergies when the relinquished their shares to the new owners(CW)?

At this rate the SP of all the stocks will be zero by midyear.

I hate to use the F word but I will do it now. Don't forget your FUNDAMENTALS. Stocks have Value because it operates a business that has Profits. If you are looking for something that is pure speculations, LUNA is on a firesale at the moment.

Hi can anyone explain the RNS and how it will affect SP moving forward? There are lots of things that are new to me.

The real question is, was it coincidence that a very pliable judge was put in charge of a first-of-its-kind civil case between large corporations?

That could explain how some are sure of the decision ahead of time.

So we need to buy after SP rises. Got it.

In all seriousness, CINE will have posted their first positive 2 quarter of earnings well before the hearing. You are suggesting buying after the news.

SP is currently down in line with market sentiment. Now is the time to pick winners and hold before the rise.

Are you not happy enough to lose 70% from being Long CINE and now you want to lose more shorting it?

Where did the XRP bragging lead you?