Member Info for Techtonic

Think he did, then had to reappoint!

Share price is absolute bottom on chart at 3p..

Inverted hammer, usually reversal to come.

If it falls further than 3p, all bets are off!

4) the BOD are worse than "poor comms". They are outright misleading and don't care about shareholders.

I respect and like your posting on here, Green, but like when Brondby once did this (I think), only a Bull can state a poor Bear case.

Because there's an inherent internal conflict there's always a slant.

And for clarity, I'm a bear (long term) , but in for a short term gain.

So, bigger additions to the LT Bear case :

1)Cizzle's LT Revenue Projections are very poor (unless something has changed)

2) Cizzle is not in control any more, and US companies tend to want a US listing, or go private.

I can definitely see Ciz go the way of many small cap companies recently and go private. That will bust all shareholders if it happens.

3) The test is easier to carry out than CT, but similar cost etc. major traction depends on internal politics in healthcare in USA.

So...if on time, we're looking at April.

I would think there will be a build-up of more people building a state end of March, beginning April.

The usual FDA turnaround for such an application (De Novo), including questions and comments, is within 150 days.

So they've been taking their time with this one

One things for sure, no-one s in profit at this level.

Still got all those 3.7p's to churn, so expecting a move higher at some point, unless the Trump effect has farted on some things Stateside

..where the MMs brought it down to support on fairly thin volume.

I wondered if they would do this and held some back to grab a few more.

Time only will tell if this was a foolish move! (There may be stuff going on in the background but the volume suggests otherwise - unless there are some delayed trades)

Hear, hear, D Craig.

I really hope it works out for you and long-term investors.. your loyalty should be rewarded.

With nine posts to your name I could make the same accusation about agenda/etc.

I'm taking it you've probably been banned at some point and come under a different name.

But I don't care if you have an agenda or not. I'll take your posts at face value and if there's anything to be gleaned, I'll learn.

But I doubt it because you're one of these people who can see agendas and think they want to control other people's minds.

WordSpag,

You seems to be lacking irony, but high on hypocrisy..

Since you have a handful of posts to your own name and all you have done is snipe.

I was in N4P in the old Viagra days from 6P to 32 p.

I made quite a bit of money but could see the writing on the wall.

I've been out a few years but I have posted in the past. Why does it concern you if I've posted before or not?

Ad hominem. Play the ball and not the player.

Get a life.. if you want to follow me around and stalk me with Petty BS, that's your call.

I am a little bit dismayed and downhearted about some of the comments, ref me, on this board

To be honest I don't understand the terms like "disruptive" "agendas" etc.

I come from a world of science in journalism and share trading in the 1990s when all information was a valuable and all views were welcomed.

Now people's get into their little cliques, tribal views and paranoia.

Just take each post on its merit and stop trying to look deeper. I've got quite a few shares here at 0.6p, and I shall continue posting as and when I want to.

This is not a little boy's club for a dozen of individuals.

This is a shareboard for people who either invest here or want to invest here.

But like all these boards it has a little obviously "leaders".

Drop the egos and just get on with it.

Ps I don't know what your averages or level of investment here, Leister, but I'm guessing that the majority of people are finding it difficult to remain enthusiastic when they've been diluted to oblivion.

I'm guessing that most people have got an average of somewhere between 2p and 10p.. just from holding for several years...?

Hi Leister,

I admire your enthusiasm and, despite a long hiatus before getting back into this share, I understand and share your views on this prospects of the product..

But when you ask why no one is talking of the potential

.. isn't that what people have been talking about for the best part of a year or two years?

Hasn't it just worn a bit thin with people and now there's an expectation of a meaningful tie-up.

There oesn't appear to be much more to be said on potential.

I completely get what you're saying and share the frustration that the market doesn't appear to get this yet.

Like shlum has said too (and many others on here), N4P appears to have on its hands a world-best unique delivery system, stable, cost effective and multi-loading.

It does seem incredible and ridiculous that the market cap is a mere £1.8million, when £10mill to £20million would still appear reasonable.

Just think that the market remains very skeptical, like long-suffering shareholders here. Everyone is willing licensing deals/poss partnership and then it should be fireworks.

WordSpag..Well if you find any more info on the Orphan Drug status, please feel free to share, thanks.

All I'm saying about the trades on Friday is they are absolutely tiny volume and meaningless.

Probably PI trades.

👍😁

ਧੰਨਵਾਦ ਜੋਏ. ਤੁਸੀਂ ਮੇਰੇ ਹੀਰੋ ਹੋ

And I really mean what I say, Joey!

Another rather interesting large Dump at close.

Spaghetti..

With all respect I've got to taglia-tell-yee that the buying into close was chicken feed.

Just a few very small non-rounded trades..

(Apologies again to Homer 😁)

I've started setting my clock by this share..up to 2.3p everyone sells (except Joey) down to 1.5p everybody buys.

Repeat.

Hi Steve, I've been playing this game for 25 years Plus.

It was predictable and I was waiting for it. Absolute bottom 1.41p, but it might not get there.

"filled!"

What's going on, if you're a little inexperienced in share dealing, this fall back to 1.6p was almost certainly bound to happen.

A massive gap like that on the chart is just about always filmed when there's a time distance between news and the subsequent event.