Member Info for technoInvest

That's my buy just gone through.

1,500,000 @ .0547.

Enjoy your days all.

Hello MOS gang.

I was contemplating on the debate yesterday afternoon and thought I would share this with you. Not specific to MOS as you can apply this to any company but I would hope that everyone can see how people see their investment success / failure at times. I know it applies to me sometimes although I try not to think like that.

Two scenarios:

1) A company does amazingly well. Investor says wow I timed that well. I am on fire at the moment and bordering on a genius. Let's repeat that several times then I will be rich. Note the lack of credit to the company.

2) A company does poorly. Not always the actual company but the share price which can often be the same thing. Investor says I can't believe how incompetent the management are. What the hell are they doing. Bunch of idiots! Note the lack of reflection on oneself here...

Anyway. Thought I would share that with you all. I will be adding later today...

☮️💕☮️💕☮️💕☮️💕☮️💕☮️💕☮️💕☮️💕

(hoping that these little icons soothe the obvious pain of my fellow bulletin board posters)

They explain it very clearly. May I draw your attention to the office space just being recharged and the other items "at on or below market rates". Companies have costs!

From the RNS:

The Agreement has been expanded after a full evaluation by the Board to ensure it provides fair and good value to the Company as it scales up. The Agreement covers the provision of office space, on a re-charged basis, as well as creative, technical and office support to the Company in operating its Streams data service and NFT platforms at on or below market rates, contains a 90 day notice period and is subject to 6 monthly review. In the year to 30 June 2023, Kruchdata Limited paid Ignite £172,000 of fees.

Bluepun. I agree with you. As we all discussed last week or the week before (when the haters were being nicer and seemed in better spirits) the inter company payments are not ideal but I was pleased to see how transparent they are about it.

At the end of the day in my view it is exactly as the company has explained it but if you want to look at it in the most negative way possible just add it onto the renumeration of those or something like that!!

The bigger issue for me is now why are these 6 accounts all kicking off? I will be adding tomorrow as I think I get what's going on here in terms of games and after todays RNS I am more positive.

Lostmoney. Are you (pick the 1 that best matches):

1) A shareholder who is very annoyed with MOS

2) A shareholder that has mostly / fully sold who is very annoyed with MOS

3) Someone who is short

4) Someone who is looking to buy but at a lower rate

💕💕💕💕💕💕

Lostmoney. That's not right though is it. At least put the facts out correctly.

It's cool to pick out things they have done and say the negative argument and I think it's okay to actually say the things that I see as positives as that's my right.

They raised £675,000 @ 0.07 and then £114,756 @ 0.06.

So that is £789,756 in December 2023 and January 2024.

Lostmoney. touché

Surely you can see that it looks a bit odd having 6 people all going for the attack on what was a decent and clear update?

I have been very transparent about when I invested and added.

Got to love a short squeeze possibility as that adds the perfect storm if you get lucky enough to pick a company that turns around from a low base and combine that with the shorts getting squeezed (maybe a bit of that happened a few weeks ago with our shared pick HE1).

This is getting silly now. 6 posters all on the attack.

Looking at the number of posts historically from these "investors" about MOS is quite revealing.

Amtech: 30 MOS posts in last 30 days

scottyboy1966: 4 MOS posts in last 30 days

lostmoney: 34 MOS posts in last 30 days

Hepseal: 13 MOS posts in last 30 days

Systemicbods: 4 MOS posts in last 30 days

Lothbury: 11 MOS posts in last 30 days

Has anyone else actually looked up Mr Farzad Peyman (mentioned in the RNS). For a company with a £3 million market cap to attract someone like that to work with them is a result before he actually does anything.

Add that to the technology partner (who also invested £400K).

I may well have picked a company that does not perform as I expect (and hope!) over the next few months but I am happy with how things are looking whilst not wanting to appear insensitive to any of the genuine shareholders that have been here longer than myself.

Scottyboy1966. No I am not.

Make that 5 people now all chipping in to try and discredit the company.

Really makes you think what the purpose of all these posts are...

It's a bit strange that on what I thought was a decent update we get 4 serial posters all gunning for anything that they can. Including me.

lostmoney

Hepseal

Systemicbods

Lothbury

You see lots of comments on these boards about shorters and normally I think that is people making excuses for genuine selling but part of me thinks that we may have a bit of that going on here.

In the fullness of time these market games all sort themselves out so this could be very interesting if this is the game here.

Silversprings. Thanks.

NFTs: I like what they have done and to be fair to them they have generated some revenues but for me it is not as exciting as the betting venture. For a number of reasons including betting is a mature market and that they have the free marketing with the other partners which I think we all agree was an uphill struggle for a small company with limited funds.

Revenues from betting: IMO one step at a time. They need to get this launched and then grow it. I am invested here to see them get things up and running and then I hope that I stick with this as a long term investment and hold it for many years. But revenues are not the most important thing for me initially. On that though they can show dramatic growth if they get it right which is where the value is as opposed to investing in a much larger proven betting business.

I am not sure why many are being so negative (surely they are not short of the stock?) as I am very pleased with how things are looking although it is very early days and the company has a lot to demonstrate.

ME also put £25,000 of his annual salary into MOS in the December raise (the other directors also subscribed for shares).

Taking the figures I posted earlier (£82,500) that is roughly one third of his salary back into MOS shares which will be tied up longer term as they can not trade them like us retail shareholders.

I don't see many other AIM company directors giving such a big commitment.

That's a bit unfair and overly negative IMO.

"The Agreement has been expanded after a full evaluation by the Board to ensure it provides fair and good value to the Company as it scales up. The Agreement covers the provision of office space, on a re-charged basis, as well as creative, technical and office support to the Company in operating its Streams data service and NFT platforms at on or below market rates, contains a 90 day notice period and is subject to 6 monthly review. In the year to 30 June 2023, Kruchdata Limited paid Ignite £172,000 of fees."

I checked the annual accounts released in December and his salary was listed as £82,500. Even if one third of that Ignite fee was just going directly to ME as a "salary top up", which it is not as you can see from what they state it is for, then his annual pay from running MOS would be £140K. That is not especially high for even a small quoted company.

For clarity that is not what they say it is for and when you invest in a company big or small you trust the company to try and progress the company which to me it looks like they are doing now.

Mr Farzad Peyman seems like a serious player in the betting space. Check out his bio on the website they mention in the RNS. That's made my day reading that appointment. Have a great evening all.

Nice update from the company to keep us informed. Here is my take on it.

Advisory Committee formation

- Good development as many shareholders think that things happen overnight but clearly quality people are needed to make good things happen.

IgniteAMT Limited Agreement

- I like the transparency here as last week or perhaps it was the week before people were saying that this agreement was shady and I think this RNS explains it clearly.

Warrant issuance

- Seems fair to me. That is 200% roughly from where we are so I doubt any new investors will be that concerned about this. Interesting that they have only given them a 1 year life!

P.S. Just added 2,000,000 MOS @ .0547

Sorry but I must be missing something here. I got the 9th degree from a few of the posters here last week so....

On your history "My stock pick is Petards…" on 23 Sep 2023. According to the LSE chart the price was 6.875 at that time. The price now, after a very good daily rise on tiny volume, is 7.50 to 8.50 but it did dip quite a bit after you picked it so if that was timed right (let's say 1.5 months after you picked it) I agree they could have probably got a nice gain from when they bought it if they timed it well.

My earlier comment was more about chasing risers so the time to buy PEG (Petards) was perhaps before today!

Lothbury. PET? Showing as no change on LSE? What price did you suggest this company at / when? Obviously no one should be taking advice from comments here, just getting ideas to research at the very most, but selling something that is pretty much at all time lows to buy something up 23% on the day is perhaps not the best idea IMO.