Member Info for Teacup64

Who votes that Sino should say what's best regarding the alluvials?

The irony: of = off ;)

A very good way of building hopes that he can shake of as a simple mistake when liability points his way!

"supporting our assessment that volume is the key to a successful alluvial operation". ....Really!?!? ......My five year old could have assessed that!

We've waited along time for that folks, lap it up before it's gone!

H50 - Colins already got that for us, but thanks.

Makes me wonder if 'substantial' was supposed to be 'sustainable'? ......we know CBs game!

....Oh, wait a minute......my mistake, the donkey already realises that the carrot is rigged!

Chesh Is doing rather well...post of the (yester)day: "lol, SRS69, when your old enough to wear long trousers" ;) ...Nothing against SRS69, but that made me laugh!

;)

For anyone interested, they offer the benefit of a 0% interest rate.

I had chosen to keep my money in an HSBC savings account.....hindsight!

We need material news, not a dangled carrot every time.....Book writers the world over are probably jealous of the creative minds of AIM ceos

Well, looking at the SP, that RNS was a waste of ink..... LK could have reduced our outgoings even more so ;)

Copper?!? What's that gotta do with the price fish?

Jamieiecakes - I haven't got time to answer that just yet, but a quick glance over the RNS says that you should be confused about what I said.....I can't seem to work out what I was on about anymore myself. I hope I haven't mislead myself! I'm gonna have a deeper dig around when I get back.

Regardless of actual profits received by XTR, it was the "net profit" statement that was the important part. I was simply using the $800k as a reference point to demonstrate the twisting of truth, as we actually incurred a loss in the period in question. As for the Q4 part....lol, I can't remember saying anything to do with Q4'17 ;) Nonetheless, what's done is done and I haven't sold, so I should really move on and question CB rather than repetitively scaremonger.

On rereading my post, I think I explained it really badly....attempt 2: Nobody said that we would get good results in Q1, agreed. However, the point I was making is that we were led to believe we made net profit of $800k, when it was later found to be a loss....it's not the loss(bad q1 results) that I am highlighting, but rather the fact that such a figure would even be stated without explanation. That said, it is old news now, no longer relevant to the board as its a point that has been heavily discussed recently. Anyways, I believe it was the user Pie314 that managed to get through to the company, who said that June will be news rich. I hate to say it, but each newsless day that passes inevitably puts us one step closer to building upon the foundations CB has built over the past year. Foundations that I praise CB for regardless of the one issue I have.

L200 - maybe Joel insisted that his wage be calculated using the dodgy calculator!

Riskisprofit - Most of us forseen a slow start up, which isn't really the problem, but rather the nature of the business. The sun is upon Mozambique, so expecting a nice uplift in Sino production this Q.