Stephan Bernstein, CEO of GreenRoc, details the PFS results for the new graphite processing plant. Watch the video here.
Here is the link: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2016/02/29/amazons-arrival-could-let-morrisons-off-the-hook-online/ I'm thoroughly confused: Ocado's RNS said Morrison - Amazon deal is a "win-win" outcome for both Ocado & Morrisons but then, Ocado SP crashes....so, what's going on ? I've tried hard to understand whatever is written on this subject, but am unable to figure out what's going to be Ocado's "win" from this deal. I humbly request Rocka999, whose opinions and strategic thinking I always respect very highly, to explain the implications of the above deal for Ocado from a medium -term perspective. Please reply at your own convenience......Thanks very much.....sincere apologies for troubling you....regards Tanganyika
Thanks, Sahid.....Understood. Anyway, I am greatly reassured by your words : " All I can say is that it was very positive. " Regards. Tanganyika.
I would be grateful if you would kindly copy & paste on this BB the link to the Techinvest article referred to below. Thanks very much.........Regards....... Tanganyika.
Minimise Water "chooses" Propelair co's "revolutionary 1.5 litre flush toilet" Vs. traditional 9 litre flush......... "84% less water usage and up to 60% saving in water bill." Here is the link: http://www.connectingindustry.com/EnergyManagement/propelair-is-first-to-be-launched-in-new-range-of-washroom-products.aspx My (wild) thoughts as below: Potential savings in water usage, if these water-efficient toilets replace the traditional ones in existing housing and in industry sectors, could be huge, apart from big savings in water bills to UK's 30 million homes....makes me wonder why the HMG is doing nothing to encourage the saving of this precious resource. 30,000,000 x (say) 5 flushes per day x 7.5 litres(9L-1.5L) water saved/flush x 360 days = 1,125,000,000 litres (1.125 billion litres) of water be would saved annually by installing these "revolutionary" toilets in UK homes...add to this, UK public & private sector toilet water saving.........1.125 bln litres x average price (pence)/ litre = £????.....annual reduction in water bills for UK's domestic sector......no idea what the domestic water tariff is This is a "back of the envelope" calculation......it is highly likely to be flawed..... Tanganyika
http://www.qubeonline.co.uk/wake-up-to-water-higher-profits-could-be-on-tap/ Worth a read.......Apc (Minimise Water) would appear to be well placed to capitalise in this growth sector. GLA Tanganyika
.....If someone would kindly advise me whether I should buy a stake now , before H1 Results , rather than after. Thanks.....Tanganyika
Pinkers said on Thurs 13:02 (15.10.15): " Worrying. Tosca & Griffiths now hold 35%; add other major institutional shareholders and we are looking at well over 60%. Us small fry ....... " My own humble opinion, for what it's worth, is: 1. Tosca & Griffiths' relentless stake-building suggests they are acting ( in concert ?) with a common objective viz. to attain, with the support of the major II's , voting rights approaching at least 2/3 (66.66%) whereupon 2. Tosca, Griffiths & the II's would demand that Blinkx BoD set up an EGM where 3. a Special Resolution (jointly tabled by Tosca, Griffiths& the II's) would propose the removal (sacking) of CEO BM or possibly the entire BoD (including BM) and 4. a further Special Resolution nominating a named CEO/ new BoD (previously agreed by Tosca, Griffiths & the IIs) be voted upon by the shareholders. If this is the real objective of Tosca/Griffiths (ie to sack BM & his BoD), then, it seems to me, it is attainable because, as Pinkers said, Tosca, RG & the IIs could easily muster two-thirds majority to enable the above two Special Resolutions to be passed at the EGM. Meanwhile, I would assume, RG/Tosca will have already found a suitable, dynamic CEO with a strong marketing background (possibly an American ? ) to replace BM. I do not know what the precise procedure or mechanism is for the removal of a CEO/BoD. So, what I've set out above could be imprecise or wrong or both.......however, I feel sure, RG/Tosca are acting in concert and their stake-building at regular intervals is intended to create a two-thirds voting block (with the II's support) required to call an EGM with the express intention of sacking at least the CEO, BM, if not the entire BoD. Whether the appointment of a new CEO would result in a significant rise in SP .......the short answer is: I don't know. I guess, the new CEO's reputation, experience etc in this sector would dictate impact, if any, on the SP, in the short term. The scenario I've set out above is pure speculation and several very experienced posters on this BB might well conclude that this is all a load of hot air/rubbish and I will gladly accept that. One final point: regarding a point raised by rustybucket about " Brian's option price for a start....I think Tosca and RG know more than that " ( see below his post of Thurs 15:02 ), I trust rusty would guide me as to how Brian's options would fit into the above scenario.....apologies to rusty in advance, if this is a silly request. Thanks. .....ATB.......Tanganyika. PS: I had 5k Blnkx shares (av cost 60p) since 2007. Out of sheer frustration, about two months ago, I sold the lot at a price c. 22p, taking a LOSS of £2000...BM's incompetence became intolerable. If, Brian produces a miracle in the H1 results due in c. Nov, I intend to jump in, if only to recover my losses. If someone would kindly advise me wheth
article on the above subject ex: the investors chronicle (18 Aug 2015)......here is the link: http://www.investorschronicle.co.uk/2015/08/18/comment/chronic-investor-blog/chart-of-the-day-lightning-progress-for-led-technology-0733SBSQnFy7ghDLx8XrQN/article.html wonder why Minimise Grp (apc) is not mentioned .....nevertheless, worth a read...........ATB.........Tanganyika