Member Info for SYN00GOLD

Ingenuity to break even by

2028/29 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

Https://twitter.com/DefenceHQ/status/1701341988061065473

Https://twitter.com/HarlandWolffplc/status/1701606589583745154

He also posted this 1 hour ago

‘Looking forward to the release of this report from The Chamber.

There are undoubtedly fantastic opportunities ahead for the UK and maritime related business, but we as an industry need to collaborate more to even begin to build back the Britannia that used to 'rule the waves'.

The construction of 6 ships displacing anything between 10-25,000 tonnes will demand considerable shipyard capacity and it may involve an industrial consortium. Assuming the FSS project remains on track, then the regenerated Harland & Wolff shipyard at Belfast could be an ideal assembly site for such large vessels.

I am not at liberty to disclose my reasoning, but I think some of you have alluded to some of the positives that are on the way, and some that have not materialised as of yet. Taking a flight on holiday now. See you all again in mid Sept. I'm going to avoid logging on and giving my wife a relaxing holiday away from me accessing share information 😂.

What a great day, keep safe and healthy !!!

This share will rise VERY fast over coming weeks. Remember you were told 🎁😊🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀

Part 2

They seek to impugn three decisions taken by the respondent, the Department

for Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs (‘DAERA’) in November 2021,

namely;

(i) The grant of a Marine Construction Licence under the Marine and Coastal

Access Act 2009 (‘MCA 2009’);

(ii) The grant of a revised Discharge Consent under the Water (Northern Ireland)

Order 1999; and

(iii) The grant of a revised Abstraction Licence under the Water Abstraction and

Impoundment (Licensing) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2006.

Conclusions

[165] For the reasons set out, none of the grounds are made out and the application

for judicial review is dismissed.

[166] I will hear the parties on the question of costs.

Https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7102970338874925056/

Bread and butter 😊

Agree Kaeren, the significance of UKEF will be massive and not being discussed much >>>>>>YET !!

HarChris : I think this is likely to bag over next month. 😂🚀😊😎🎁🤣

PS That is slightly rampy, however, other companies will probably have a price to buy of minimum north of £70 million now. Nice position for JW to be in !!!!

I beg to differ Stokie : relax, it's over !!!

Everything has now failed, applicants costs gonna be very expensive. Hope they bought some H&W shares 😉😂🚀🚀🚀👀

Congratulations everyone. Future is very bright. Over and out.

Think we will start seeing news on FID soon and the big investors will start returning.

This is MASSIVE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

No scientific effect on wildlife or anything else in the sea.

Losing every point currently, for Consuela (AKA Lisa D) - I wish you well, but you cannot appeal !!!!

This is now worth a fortune albeit whether its sold off/kept/partner shipped > No wonder JW had champagne and oysters.

This will explode now !!! mid 20's next !!!!!

I'm fuelling up the rocket for take off. This share is about to explode into orbit 🎁😊 !!!!!!!

🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀

Judge just declined another, no grounds for further leave !!!!

Conor looks defeated !!!!

Applicant has lost 1st ground !!

......................and the news was imminent.....................dilution and more money for Tim's wages 🤣🤦‍♂️ !!!!

Classic

PART 1 recap for No Gas Caverns Vs Island Magee Energy Limited on 31 March 2023

HUMPHREYS J residing: (Same Judge for tomorrow)

Introduction

[1] In this application for judicial review, the applicants challenge the decision of

the Minister for the Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs

(‘DAERA’) to grant a Marine Construction Licence, a Discharge Consent and an

Abstraction Licence to Islandmagee Energy Limited. These permissions are

associated with the development of a gas storage facility at Islandmagee.

[2] The first applicant is a company formed by a group of local residents opposed

to the development whilst the second applicant is a well-known campaigner on

environmental issues.

[3] The parties have now filed extensive affidavit evidence and the application

will proceed to full hearing in May 2023. In advance of this hearing, the applicants

have brought two interlocutory applications:

(i) To strike out parts of the respondent’s evidence, pursuant to Order 41 rule 6

of the Rules of the Court of Judicature (NI) 1980 (‘the Rules’); and

(ii) For production of an unredacted version of a ministerial submission dated

31 March 2021, pursuant to Order 24 rule 14 of the Rules.

CONCLUSION

[36] Both the applicants’ applications are dismissed, and I will hear the parties on

the question of costs.

Current Score : 1-0 H&W 🤞