Member Info for Surely

You are asking me not to post , unless it is something positive, ha ha lol. Best of luck

Glugger, in the oil patch i hold Hurricane and Bowleven

Glugger, no i dont hold RRL shares. ( bit of a waste of a question , cos its well known )

Glugger , referring to "bitterness" is straight out the returning multi id handbook. Total giveaway. But good luck to you. I doubt you will last to long here.

Glugger, you didn't ask me a question, I asked you one though, and it is you that is answering with questions. I've asked you two now. First was who did you post as before, and the second was "what bitterness are you referring too" Try to answer them and I'll happily answer yours too

Trump , I think we both know that is not quite what happened. I said I'll answer yours if you answer one of mine first and unfortunately you didn't accept. So just let me know and I'll answer.

Glugger, What bitterness are you referring too ? I'm not aware of posting anything bitter. ( The word however is most used by returning multi ids though. Just saying )

great stuff Glugger, who did you post as before though, cmon I won't tell Admin

Glugger, good luck to you, although there weren't that many buys at .19 recently so if you did buy in at that price can't be a very large amount even if a majority stake.

Pirate Pete is a legend on AIM. Is he in jail now, or did he just stand trial. Once revered by Celtic Heart too. One in a long line of World Class CEOs that Range were lucky enough to recruit.

Glugger , you are "a novice PI" but you know about Pirate Pete. Ha ha good luck to you spinning your yarn, but it is always fun watching the story unravel. Windy is also a returning multi Id, but he keeps his head down and has managed to stay under the Admin radar since he joined in April. Good luck to Windy too, he's not a bad un.

Glugger, so do you post on Advfn ? why post here now on lse. Have you been reading for a long time but just decided it was time to post ?

Boyzee , indeed the sp is holding up well. Definitely loyal retail shareholders, although the warrant holders cashed in. Anyway good luck, wont post anymore. ( it is at this point other posters ( eg primal ) start to get angry at any criticism of their share, even when you have quoted from the accounts you are still accused of posting rubbish )

Windy, ha ha I merely quoted word for word the actual statement. But I guess by your standards , your interpretation will be last day of September though to hit a "mid 2018" target. Btw , why do you think Perlak is ahead of schedule ? and you also seem to have changed your mind on TT waterflood. Before you were posting "The waterflood itself could push the figure to the 1500 mark" now you seem to be finding excuses about why it isn't hitting targets.

Boyzee , of course maybe. But it looks like there was none right up to end November. So unlikely that it suddenly started straight after that. Anyway good luck, I wouldn't buy here just yet. The SP is way ahead of itself at 60 million on falling revenues of a couple of hundred grand. If the contracts are taking this long to provide real revenues then I would guess they will continue to take longer than expected even now. So future estimates are probably overestimated imho. But good luck.

Visan "But over 1 million in cash ..." remember that was the figure at the end of the accounting period which is I believe End Nov 17. So there will have been six month cash drain from then. So i would expect it to be well under a million by now.

Glug, the last update was "Field operations expected to commence in Indonesia, targeting first production in mid-2018 (calendar year);" So obviously this is the target. In the past RRL has never hit any of its targets , so yes all eyes on this one.

elrico, so I must say it comes as a bit of a shock to learn that you don't know the difference between revenue and money raised by warrants and equity placings.

ok, i read the last one , and I'm still none the wiser. Some warrants were exercised at 8p. Now please explain what that has to do with revenue ?

elrico, Exercising warrants does not raise revenue. That would be equity. So I'm only asking you to explain what you mean, because at first reading it doesn't make sense. ( Surely easier than daft statements like "there is no hope for you" )