focusIR May 2024 Investor Webinar: Blue Whale, Kavango, Taseko Mines & CQS Natural Resources. Catch up with the webinar here.
It's quite simple the rod launch news as stated at the time was made up. There was no launch then and the claimed comments by the Century CEO were invented. Recent comments about first scale up were also untrue. As yet the nomad has failed to advise how the comment that cash was significantly ahead of expectations could be made. So when you find known lies one can only guess at what other lies have been pushed out. The obvious answer to me is at the very least the CEO should get the boot.
And to add they have still not announced at any point that the tech works to the commercial levels stated. The details to back that up is fully documented over on ADVFN. The 'It's a fair cop guv" and move on from there has yet to appear, IF people do their jobs.
Unfortunately the issue is I'm undeniably right that they released false news and other false information. The reporting of that seems to be the reason for the share price dive. All that is left is for the Nomad, FCA or AIM to do something about it.
Well it looks like the kit AGM commissioned the CPI to build can't produce the GNPs to the standard re the recent CPI tender for synthetic GNPs. No mention of the tender win by AGM for 1kg of them which in high quality GNBPs terms would be above their entire sales for a year.
I dropped on the lies looking at graphene stocks. VRS is the lead in the market overall Imo because the market is full of BS hype and misleading info. UMO invested as are Cambridge Uni through the acquisitions, CPI just more or less said VRS are the best in all products they applied for in a tender. Whatever VRS put in for they got and Boron Nitride which none of us knew they were doing. Stuffed full of big names talking to them as repeated many times by the company. Weakness currently due to the Lombard small caps offload. The supply may be near it's ned but can;t be sure due to the pension fund holding which was under Henderson Largest revenue through diversified assets. I'm not going to ramp it, you asked so I answered. BTW Haydale don't produce graphene so don't make that mistake many have. They enable graphene but are not unique and its not needed in many cases. As always DYOR. All I want re AGM, the Nomad, the FCA or whoever to declare it was a lie and then move on. They have more than one misleading part to them though so how can you trust anything ever said. They may get the tech working but I think is was developed 5-7 years ago and there is no sign it works as planned yet.
BTW whoever backs them on any fund raise will get my file sent to them to check if they were aware during fund raise chats. Sick to death of lying companies and nomads.
Doh That should read first scale up news was a lie too.
Thanks Nice to know someone believes it. The answer to me is simple tell the market how naughty they have been and then move on. Disgraceful that the FCA and nomads have not done anything about it. Had comms to meet the company and meet the IP group Ch investment officer and so on. What do I do caution them before they speak and answer questions?? Nomad compliance team wouldn't send me their note to justify the "cash significantly" ahead bit. They may sort the tech to get to commercial levels I don't know but clearly well hidden under the hype it says the tech doesn't work as it should. First case up news is a lie too. They has added a reactor and were on Mk IV before that news came. Ink looks like a desperate attempt to show something. They have named and trademarked ink which is very early stage. The last time I looked their graphene has no name and trademark.
slam dunk lie.
Well finally its starting to come out a bit more publicly and it sure is a small dunk lie. AIM Listed Applied Graphene and the BIG LIE exposed: BTW it is Placing ahoy Published 6 hours ago Companies that tell lies to investors are ones that should be avoided like the plague. If you pick a company up on one lie the odds are that there are stacks of others going undetected. That brings me to Applied Graphene Materials (AGM) where I will demonstrate a slam dunk lie. Then we will turn to its looming cash crisis.
Probably due to that. retailers go for 2 years but no one wanted to listen to that warning. It was said they would never get to 2 years. The only reason they got to 18 months was by washing the condoms pre adding the drug, this removed the chemicals that caused the degradation of the drug. I assume you all know that. The patent for the original isn't that far off so why would C and D launch when they know others can join in. So an added process to the production line and still no 2 year shelf life. MED is a con too as why does it need dermasys when their is mucous membrane to exploit which doesn't have the dermal barrier, that's how CSD works. As for Barder and shares no doubt most if not all are free options. It means squiff all he has been paying himself about £250k per year for probably about 4 hours per week. FUM has been a fantastic success for him in salary and a cushy number. Far not I suspect FUM will become a 'money back' candidate in the future by other means. You can only lie for so long and get away with it.
All I do is try to warn Pis re findings. If you chose.not to read and not DYOR as its too boring then no moaning of it all goes wrong. If you trust what a company nomad/broker says and rely entirely on that then you are fools. There have been countless examples of false news on many Aim companies which have gone horribly wrong. That alone should be the warning to DYOR. So what you are saying is your positive view and posting is based on very limited research so you are in virtually blind trusting news and nomads. Anyway too much said on here already, what will be will be.
re "I note in the CEO's latest epistle that fundraising may be required to finance future expansion." On IPO they raised funds to expand to 8 tonnes and didn't do that. Then on the last fund raise they raise finds to expand to 6 tonnes and haven't done it. They said in 2016 when expanding to 1.5 tonnes was the first expansion but they clearly stated they added a second reactor in 2014 on expansion. Then later it talks about mark 4 equipment, then talk suggesting learning from that earlier tech which seems to have failed and has not changed. I have put the full details in a header on ADVFN which relate to AGMs own news. So if you are aware of that and DYOR research then you may have a clear picture of where AGM are. Feel free to report the content of the header to the company and any other relevant party you consider appropriate. I can't say much more than that at this time. Note they said cash was significantly ahead of expectations . The only reason I can see for that is that they didn't spend the money to expand. But soon they will be back for more money to expand on tech that is not yet proven to work by AGM's own verification in risks which is unchanged since IPO. The vast majority of cash goes on staff salaries, something like £3m to £3.5 mill in staff costs.
Bright It's in an AGM header on ADVFN. It's too large to go on here
You may with to read this or go for the head in the sand typical approach. The AGM tech does not work the can not produce in bulk https://uk.advfn.com/cmn/fbb/thread.php3?id=41265020
You are walking down a blind alley created by this company. Read all of their news the tech does not work like many think. If you don;t read it and things don;t work out, tough JVs and the like are formed on the same misinformation. I won't be back to post again.
Darn spell correct Functionalisation
Yes Talga are a partner of Haydale. Haydale don't produce graphene so they need suppliers, although many don't need Haydale tech to functionalism it or disperse their own GNPs.
Lateral sizes are poor so no good for composites on strength for Talga but should be ok for coatings and the like. Talga do a range which includes 100 of layers which is no goof for strength either. Most of the product it seems will be graphite which has a market.
I did try to warn you poor sale v huge progress claims previously and they still haven't proven the tech can produce amounts of graphene. As in the last 3 annual reports and stated again today "The Group has not yet demonstrated its technology at either nameplate production capacity or increased capacities " So selling grams, and kit than can only produce grams per day yet they tell you they are scaling up again (last capacity reported 1.6 tonnes) which is just hype. The scale up is the fund raise story but it should be 6 - 12 months before they go to the market for cash. I seem to have found a possible issue for synthetic graphene too but AGM do not list data. For 2 companies that use the AGM method there is an obvious substantial issue with producing GNPs with a good lateral size. Perhaps AGM don't have that problem but their data is not listed to view to confirm that or not.