Member Info for Summit

Yes toffers I know what disbursements are having paid them....we are speaking in an international context...hence why I referred to geography. Quite obvious really.

They may only make an exclusion on renewal

Director and officers insurance is common especially in this context. Suspect there is not a specific queeld exclusion. This is a uk domiciled company with russian subs. Why wouldn't there be international disbursements.

Toffers we are doomed we should all run for the hills. If they're not covered not much we can do we are in it and if we lose tough on us...ok! Now give it a rest.

You've made ur point tc....twice or us it because u baiting?

Be helpful to many if ur right.....just need decent government in those relevant jurisdictions...

Just waiting for toffers to pop in but maybe toffers is awol. Or is toffers coming back in another guise ? Tdt are you unhappy?

With the concentrate out to tender just a matter of time for it to be sold.....they mentioned multi participants so that's a positive isn't it?

Don't suppose you can hammer eua anymore than it has been...pretty rotten for most investors...so far

Other legal costs will include company adviser retainers , drafting of legal documentation when dealing with land, mining applications with the rf etc etc. Cant remember who paid what mispare case?

Not sure re comment ikn as i doubt we would specifically see legal costs. They would be in management accounts. They may be noted under exceptional items however. No breakdown as we have all sorts of legal costs going on.

The insurance cover is likely to be capped so we don't know what the limit is. We don't know all the facts and hence are in no position to asset either way. However, I do think eua have taken legal advice and will act upon it.

If ur correct toffers you may lose money as will the rest. Does that make you feel happy? If u have skin in the game you shouldn't be.

Give it a rest toffers. Please. Its boring just wait until we get a ruling.

Bigfatlad where in the interim accounts would you say this is identified?

Magnum the loan won't show in parent interim accounts but should do in subsidiary accounts I think

Got to look at the logic of buying a gold asset of which you already have an interest in as opposed to buying an exploration company. Think newmont don't need an exploration company and complexity around this.

Let's get one thing straight if newmont want to buy 30% havieron it is the asset they will buy not the entity ggp

Beast...I would think some have started dd and some of mostly through it...this could mean new parties

I'm not agreeing with toffers simply answering your question...it made it to court didn't it but I hope it goes no further read properly