RE: Question4 Feb 2019 10:01
Antha - the way I see it is this, and it's a complex picture.
First of all, previous share price shouldn't really be looked at, too much has changed with the company in the last 12 months for the historic SP to be indicative of our future value. The business has been trimmed down with loss making bits disposed of, leaving TI as the main (only) asset.
There are probably three key variables at play at the moment, each with uncertain outcomes that are keeping the SP at the present level.
The first of these variables is the bond holders. We know that in recent weeks the bond holders have accepted, albeit reluctantly, that the most straightforward way for them to see there money back is by agreeing to the companies 'plan'. This plan is to acquire the remaining stake in TI from Rainmaker, with a view to then being in a better position to sell TI for a price that is more befitting its market value - previous bids, though not disclosed, appear to have been substantially below what the BOD see as its fair value.
The second variable is Rainmaker. We know that we had a deal with them to acquire the remaining 10%, due to the financial situation of the company they were unable to acquire the stake within the timeframe agreed. This means we need to negotiate a new deal with Rainmaker, and they know now that we need to own 100% of TI in order to get the best possible price when we then sell it. So, if you were Rainmaker would you accept the previous terms or would you try and get a bit more, I suspect the latter, so this needs to be worked through.
The third variable is what price can TI command when we go to market it. It would appear that TI is driving decent revenues and is profit making, estimates for its value are hard to come by given the other two factors above. IF it can be sold for say £150m that would enable us to wipe out the MTMY debts and leave around £80m in cash.
Lots to play for and an interesting story to unfold.
IMO