REMINDER: Our user survey closes on Friday, please submit your responses here.
Odey Assets (7.3M) and Hargreaves Lansdown (16.4M) became shareholders of RMG recently.
If Robin Hood and his merry man @ 1.75 are working for the companies they could be there (just saying)
Arsenal, good-good. RMG is a great company with a history extending 500 years back in time before establishing as PLC funded by those who became taxpayers before 2000. Right?
Arsenal, I am not an expert. My experience in shares covers only 11.5 months.
I am not patronising - you systematically avoid the question about debasing SP today in the future terms.
As for tax amount since 2000 - you only assuming, right?
Arsenal, you are good! Carry on
Arsenal, I am a UK taxpayer since 2000.
The question was about the other subject - why obsessively debase SP today in the future term?
Hi guys,
Why you are so obsessed with 1.75? Its great UK company with a long history.
Tomorrow the valuation could be any price. Why do you debase the SP today?
Robin Hood : You are entering the territory of Robin Hood and his Merry Men @ 1.75.
Rabbi Tuckman : Faygeles?
[clears their throats, trying to act macho]
Robin Hood : No, no. We're straight. Just... merry.
These Factors Make Royal Mail plc (LON:RMG) An Interesting Investment
Simply Wall St July 15, 2019
Royal Mail plc (LON:RMG) is a stock with outstanding fundamental characteristics. When we build an investment case, we need to look at the stock with a holistic perspective. In the case of RMG, it is a company that has been able to sustain great financial health, trading at an attractive share price. Below is a brief commentary on these key aspects. If you’re interested in understanding beyond my broad commentary, read the full report on Royal Mail here.
Very undervalued with excellent balance sheet
https://simplywall.st/stocks/gb/transportation/lse-rmg/royal-mail-shares/news/these-factors-make-royal-mail-plc-lonrmg-an-interesting-investment/
Scampthedog,
Thanks for your time and efforts.
You are quite correct that those possibilities may adversely affect SP.
Could you please add 'attack of the aliens' and 'the global nuclear conflict' in your range of risks.
And you, of course, will reserve all the copyrights. You might sell the range to you know whom (...)
These Factors Make Royal Mail plc (LON:RMG) An Interesting Investment
Simply Wall St July 15, 2019
Want to participate in a short research study? Help shape the future of investing tools and you could win a $250 gift card!
Royal Mail plc (LON:RMG) is a stock with outstanding fundamental characteristics. When we build an investment case, we need to look at the stock with a holistic perspective. In the case of RMG, it is a company that has been able to sustain great financial health, trading at an attractive share price. Below is a brief commentary on these key aspects. If you’re interested in understanding beyond my broad commentary, read the full report on Royal Mail here.
Very undervalued with excellent balance sheet
https://simplywall.st/stocks/gb/transportation/lse-rmg/royal-mail-shares/news/these-factors-make-royal-mail-plc-lonrmg-an-interesting-investment/
Let us play friends
Conspiracy theory (well almost).
Trying to find another site which would confirm that Odey Asset Management bought 7.3M RMG shares in June, I found that 'Hargreaves Lansdown Stockbrokers Ltd.' bought 16.44M as well
(it seems that there is no site apart from https://www.morningstar.com/stocks/pinx/roymf/ownership which provides SH data with holdings less than lower than 10M shares)
The funny thing is: fake sites published RMG articles, 'helped' Hargreaves Lansdown at the time of 'Woodford crisis' and freely use 'Deutsche Bank' rating.
Hargreaves Lansdown Stockbrokers Ltd ownership:
https://markets.ft.com/data/equities/tearsheet/profile?s=RMG:LSE
https://www.barrons.com/quote/stock/uk/xlon/rmg
Why friend? At my death bed, I will recollect your '175. dyor. pride.essex' but you deny me my small findings
Conspiracy theory (well almost).
Trying to find another site which would confirm that Odey Asset Management bought 7.3M RMG shares in June, I found that 'Hargreaves Lansdown Stockbrokers Ltd.' bought 16.44M as well
(it seems that there is no site apart from https://www.morningstar.com/stocks/pinx/roymf/ownership which provides SH data with holdings less than lower than 10M shares)
The funny thing is: fake sites published RMG articles, 'helped' Hargreaves Lansdown at the time of 'Woodford crisis' and freely use 'Deutsche Bank' rating.
Hargreaves Lansdown Stockbrokers Ltd ownership:
https://markets.ft.com/data/equities/tearsheet/profile?s=RMG:LSE
https://www.barrons.com/quote/stock/uk/xlon/rmg
Idedat,
Sorry - typo. 'Yours' - including one which is in your link.
Ideat,
These are the fake sites - including 'yours:
https://wagnerbusinessreview.com
https://rocklandregister.com
https://mayfieldrecorder.com
https://rivertonroll.com
https://sundanceherald.com
https://glenrockgazette.com
https://slatersentinel.com
https://sundanceherald.com
Redceo, as ridiculous as it may be seen - RMG SP might go down (even while the company financials are impressive) if the US Fed would still cut the rate. The US indexes/companies stocks growing on the joint expectancy of the Fed rate cuts (even up to the point of disappearing connection between price and earnings). In this respect, the investors (i guess!) might prefer the steady growth of the US stock over a potential 'no deal Brexit'. In other words UK stock falling because the market expects a greater return in the US than in UK. That is what Falkland vaguely saying - 'brexi, market, etc'. (IMHO)
Falkland, (in this view I see your messages), 175 doesn't bother me anymore.
I went as deep as -??0K and that caused me a lot of thinking. But now - have it, friend.
Redceo, your average is your private matter but since the claim being repeated again and again I decided to interfere (i will never going to details though).
And two (2) witnesses stand according to the Scripture.
Scampthedog, as far as I know, the claim that Redceo average 450 is false (we exchanged a few emails describing each other numbers) but consider this: when shorts had a contract with site 'simplywall .st' to compromise RMG SP the assessment of that site for SP was 180.
Now, after the contract, the site evaluates SP as 768. You may check yourself.
https://simplywall.st/stocks/gb/transportation/lse-rmg/royal-mail-shares