Member Info for StYd

Good evening/Happy New Year.
I found only two records of EOY SP predictions in a large volume of posts (dated 04/01/20): Prince of darkness = 366 and myself = 345 we both chose Oak Leaf. Please add yours which I missed, meanwhile:
Donation Reference: IDN034543579000
Charity: Oakleaf Enterprise
Amount: £
Transaction fee: £
Total payment: £

My understanding: Schroder (Investment Management Ltd) is the biggest SH = 14.76% + clients holdings via mutual funds (2.83+1.52+1.41) + possible (?!) indirect holding via RWC (5.02%)

Scroll down to the bottom of the page - there are three groups of the majors (the site found by JB if I remember correctly)
https://www.barrons.com/quote/stock/uk/xlon/rmg

Good evening RedCeo, JB. Thank you very much, hope you/those around you are OK as well (taking into account the current situation).
There was another interesting news regarding Amazon - 2% 'digital tax' which levies on Amazon in the Budget @ 01.04.20 which in turn Amazon wants the customers to pay.
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/facebook-google-amazon-to-be-hit-with-new-2-uk-digital-service-tax-2020-03-11
"Internet giant could pass cost of 2% digital tax imposed by Conservative government onto small business, just as it has done in France."
https://smallbusiness.co.uk/amazon-warns-small-business-will-pay-price-for-digital-services-tax-2549232/
I limited my posts only to the news (which I consider interesting) in order not to cause abusive splashes.
Stay safe gentlemen

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-amazon-com-delivery/amazon-to-suspend-delivery-service-competing-with-ups-fedex-idUSKBN21P3EB?il=0
Amazon.com Inc (AMZN.O) will suspend a delivery service that aims to compete with UPS (UPS.N) and FedEx (FDX.N) in the United States.

https://news.sky.com/story/uk-announces-2-digital-services-tax-on-facebook-google-and-amazon-11955381

Good morning Redceo, many thanks for reading.
Perhaps we overloaded with CWU/Industrial Action negative stuff which seems to be endless here that even pointing out that the shorts operate daily only a tiny volume of 0.2% daily (and maybe between themselves) seems 'refreshing' :-)

Teslo,
1. I am not arguing
2. I try to say that regardless of a private investor approach (even an ideal one) there is a price distortion caused by a third party.
In other words - there is an obstacle in a relationship 'RMG - investor' which turn any 'investing' into 'speculation' and anyone has to make 'adjustment' for a third-party interuption

Teslo,
That is what I am trying to say: perhaps @80 big institutions will not again be interested to buy 'excessive' supply of 0.2% of total shares but that would be enough to scare ('to death') private investors and force them to sell or to justify offloading money-losing division back to the public hands - why not.

The ownership:
https://simplywall.st/stocks/gb/transportation/lse-rmg/royal-mail-shares
The news:
https://www.google.com/search?q=royal+mail&newwindow=1&sxsrf=ACYBGNRHMxDQ26JLkTAV776Of4r6TNT3aA:1581577768021&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjwrbCo_M3nAhWwShUIHfLNAAgQ_AUoAXoECBEQAw&biw=1920&bih=949

Hi Teslo (apology for responding to your post addressed to Shaun)
The current daily RM trading volume is pretty minimal 0.2-0.6% fo total shares excluding the days of the shorts activity (06/02).
The institutions which hold 74% (link below) may easily buy out 'excessive' supply thus 'reducing their average', but it seems that only private investors are concern with the average at the moment but not institutions which bought a lot back in 2018.
My point is that the current price are 'comfortable' for the institutions whilst the demand from the public is fired up by the flood of the negative news (link below) including 'CWU impact' - SP is restricted artificially which also limits any valuation model (IMHO INHO)

Falkland, I acknowledge you were correct @ 175 although a bit behind schedule. You probably don't remember but you said: 'hope you buy at that price' and I have today )))

'bought more today, im in long term.' - the same

Charlie, that is a good observation. Usually, the shorts push down SP at those occasions (trading updates) but why they have changed the pattern now?

He-he.
Inhaling your own extra pure methane, Falkand?

Who?

Hey, scaremongers! Good morning, how have you been! I've got a pleasant thought for you to think the whole day: the new Chinese virus will have a devastating effect on SP (really, really). No 'falling letters, feverish anticipation of CWU's IA' could compare with that 'existential' threat. Enjoy reasonably, don't scare yourselves to panic.

Interesting (equity vs fiat currencies in the future): 'Bank Of England Says Bank Of Canada, BoE, Bank Of Japan, European Central Bank, Sveriges Riksbank And Swiss National Bank, Together With Bank For International Settlements, Have Created A Group To Share Experience On Digital Currencies'
https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/pr/date/2020/html/ecb.pr200121_1~e99d7946d6.en.html

Scampthedog's post has been deleted in which he expressed very deep and intense feeling towards myself and a very positive appraisal of my intellect (this is for information purpose only).

Scampthedog, not at all. I noticed a while ago that you and those like you usually pop up when SP is about to take a hit. 'Your' appearance is like a weather forecast in terms of SP. You usually go hand in hand with the debilitating articles from the newspapers and downgrades from 'Deutsche banks' (plural). No offence Scampthedog but that is the tragedy if are not on the shorts' payroll.