Member Info for STTsbumbag

one in a million and we have one :(

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Savant_syndrome

As always we are talking about oranges and STT1 brings apples into the equation trying to muddy the waters and mislead people and when challenged directly for yes or no answer he refuses to answer apart from I've got some bananas that will really confuse everyone.

This one thing for sure about STT1 you definitely get your five a day from him and sometimes I wish oranges were the only fruit

"Once stt1 has achieved his agenda"?? he lost a packet on GBO and then blinkx and now can't get over it and has become a troll

So if it's a completely new company why do you keep going back years and years posting information about blinkx then? It's either a new company with no problems or is it the old company with the old problems

As always STT you want your cake and to eat it and never answer any questions you or ignore the answers and just carry on with the same old questions phrased differently

"What relevance does that have today. It is a COMPLETELY new company"

with a completely NEW management...who took over only a few months ago... so I think it's relevant...

What you mean is old Orwell's animal farm where some pigs are more equal than other pigs

And perhaps we should all start using the rulebook here more, rule number 5 part G posting links without permission from the publisher. And obtaining the proper copyright

You don't need to use the he or she is it's definitely a he in the late 60s shareholders have met him at other AGMs as he as stated in posts before. No I wasn't STT1 somebody already had that before him or me..

Going back to having a balanced debate shareholders are continually asked questions when they reply that the company or the company advises have told the facts they are accused of being liars or the company is making it up for someone that constantly posts questions they never call or ring anyone at R1 about their concerns, therefore if you ask a question but can't be bothered to back it up of check it out with the company yourself when someone states facts that they have been told why continue asking questions if you don't believe the answers and have your own agenda.

I find it strange that someone that has so many posts and threads removed due to misleading never gets a ban but when people criticise the poster they immediately get a ban something doesn't seem right about that.

Anyway got better things to do now enjoy the rest of the weekend

oilovlam when I got my recent ban the administrators said it was only my opinion that what you saying was a lie

Strange that they pulled the Mars thread about why they pulled their advertising.

Then they pulled the stories about ad tech txt misinforming people after the company put out a blog explaining it.

You talk about engaging in conversation the poster never answers a straight question yes or no so how can you have a discussion with someone who only answers questions?

You talk about usernames why after two years did he turn up and use mine I was here first two years before.

You say he or she it actually someone in the late 60s who not a vendetta part rain man tendencies.

Have asked numerous times and I'm not the only one why you post so much about a share he claims he does not hold and will not say.

Also asked if he has a long position in a competitor and once is comely to foul on that basis will not say.

As many on here before have said please answer a question but he won't.

You say why ask to look at other message boards you administrators but if they did they could see what he says constantly everywhere and build up a picture.

Also he seems to complain at the drop of a hat about any personal attack about his comments and must threatened legal action to have posts removed constantly surprisingly quickly, it's long been thought that he has something to do with the message board where is most prolific as all these followers are from the technical team the and support.

I do think it's time Mr Bridges who reads this board regularly and also the other boards send an email requesting personal information about the said person to find out why or who he worked for with this vendetta against the company. Mr Bridges quotes text and posters when you talk him so does monitor the message boards.

I have no problem people putting up negative stories about the company if they are factually true with some basis! But going back eight years or more saying that we still the same company and carrying out fraud and a leopard doesn't change the spots even though he complained the other week about having three new CEOs in the year and changing the business model again he doesn't seem to think the business is changed is just ridiculous.

I also don't expect every poster here to be a shareholder as we all do research on companies or looking at message boards which we may or may not by but the post every day the year or three different message boards negative stories when you have no position in the company is even dodgy or you have seriously m*****al problems.

did get he's posts removed on advfn saying that I add multiple ids as I asked them to check my IP address login details if it be used anywhere else and if not removed the post they warned him to stop accusing me.

Although a few weeks ago when out country when login in it give me a munber instead of my name whick only happen once but didn't stop him for going on about it for days and days

Also R1 Put put out a blog the other night debunking all these programmatic tech allegations and now he's saying it was just a mistake and he was misunderstood after weeks and weeks of accusing them and pixalate of misleading the market with their league tables.

to the LSE moderator look at the R1 blog from 24 August and you will see all the allegations he's been making for the last week or two are unfounded and if you go over to advfn website you will see his grovelling apology even though you deleted the complete thread here and banned lots of posters for a few days who pointing out he was wrong

So it wasn't an opinion as you said he was misinforming people which should carry a ban

yep got a 2 day ban for pointing out the Marrs lie and asked to leave him alone

seems some people can post what they like and only have the thread removed but NOT get a ban

So I put £ instead of $ and now you're saying the over estimate of 5.5% is unbelievable I used the word could which means they may hit that target they may not hence the word could I didn't say they would.

You make lots of allegations and never back any of them up or go missing when someone asks you a question.

So two quick questions with yes and no answers

Did R1 lose a court case to DataXu and have to pay damages like your indicating a simple yes or no will do

plus

You claim that Pixalate rankings cannot be trusted and are worthless so in that case your claiming their fraudulent do you stand by that yes or no

Yep company which could potentially have more than £450 million turnover this year and only about 300 quids worth the shares traded today

ridiculous

biffa like you said some big names using R1 now just like

Castrol oil

https://www.rhythmone.com/creative/item/castrol-hotspot#h9pVBaiOXJtlwrhh.97


Straight talk?

https://www.rhythmone.com/creative/item/straight-talk-location#TOoGyS1OVMCoo1mj.97

Then of fiefs trailers

https://www.rhythmone.com/creative/item/den-of-thieves#qkgYwb4Y0SPOEbwh.97

LionsGate film productions

https://www.rhythmone.com/creative/item/jigsaw-movie-release#EM7FHe6pUwBcO7vX.97

CN Cartoon Network

https://www.rhythmone.com/creative/item/magiswords-puzzle-unit#fH5ofrfzaURc0wYX.97

And not to mention the perk website all up and running now as you say

what do you think? good news for R1 who is whiter than white now????

Facebook accused of misleading advertisers by inflating its audience size

Kansas businesswoman claims Facebook inflated its 'Potential Reach' number
Number reveals how many users were targeted by an advertisement
Facebook said suit is 'without merit and we plan to defend ourselves vigorously'

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-6071683/Facebook-accused-misleading-advertisers-inflating-audience-size.html

STT1 why don't you tell us what you think and have opinion rather than keep putting up links that are anti-rhythmone and the ad tech industry.

I've got a quick question do you hold any stock in this company either long or short?

Maybe if you're long and held stock you could have been at the AGM and asked any board member that question rather than getting it through Chinese whispers and then disagreeing with whoever says it.

Lots of your questions and posts would be better off directed answered by the company rather than some anonymous poster on the message board so may I suggest that you email rhythmone with your concerns or even phone FTI and asked them directly I'm sure they will put your mind at ease with the answers they give.

Please find contact details so you can ask them directly below

Media Industry Contact
Melissa Laverty
Seismic for RhythmOne
Melissa@teamseismic.com
or
Analyst and Investor Contact
Ed Reginelli
RhythmOne plc
or
Financial Media Contacts
Edward Bridges / Dwight Burden
FTI Consulting LLP
(UK) 020 3727 1000

STT1 you seem to find negative ad tech stories about the industry easy to find have you tried looking at the rhythmOne website in the last day or so with all the new offerings and updates there to see? Because it would be nice to get the balance view from you rather than just copying and pasting negative stories all the time which have very tenuous links to the company to say the least. Can't really remember a link you have posted which mentioned the company in it

PS quick note, you can see in the links that Americas ad tech spend is almost 12 times that of Germany

Where would you focus the company resources

What I'm saying is the main market is America, China, India, Russia where we should be concentrating our efforts and not a couple of billboards in Germany which he has turned into a negative.

Look at the first link in Germany's ad tech market is almost static just look at America's and China's growth on which market should we be focusing on? And where would our resources and time best be spent? Old techy is posting any ad tech news as bad to this company regardless of where it is in the world.

Advertising investments in Germany from 2014 to 2019* (in billion U.S. dollars)
https://www.statista.com/statistics/411243/advertising-investments-germany/

Media advertising spending in the United States from 2015 to 2021 (in billion U.S. dollars)
https://www.statista.com/statistics/272314/advertising-spending-in-the-us/

Advertising spending in China from 2015 to 2020 (in billion U.S. dollars)
https://www.statista.com/statistics/237931/chinese-advertising-expenditure/

I had my namesake here get me banned over the weekend for pointing out links which are over 10 years old and have nothing to do with the company's and when I posted links about shares he was invested in that were 10 years old guess what he complained to his friends in the city and got them removed along with me.

It's a bit like animal farm here where some animals are more equal than others

Out of curiosity stt1 haven't you posted that on at least three other message boards in the last 24 hours? And got no response from anyone?

It could have to do with it being with billboards and Germany 2 things this company isn't really bothered in.

Don't mind posts being removed's it's worst of two evils, unlike other message boards that the techy bloke posts on where he can't be edited them and change the facts.

I have been asking for ages for another well-known website to do away with the edit button and if it's legal for a poster to other database of all the posts on the website due to the recent GDPR regulations coming in, I cannot see that is legal for a further party to hold it and use it to pull up posts which he has had no permission to copy and use in the public domain, well would be illegal if they wasn't working for the website maybe