RE: Acquisition finance11 Dec 2022 11:47
PF, I’d suggest that reducing the term from 7 years to 2 years is not a concern given (a) the workout arrangement with economic benefit from Jan’21 that has resulted in the considerably lower final consideration to be paid by the Buyer and (b) the prior 2 year’s revenues (stripping out extraordinary items), which again goes to likely revenues over next 2 years.
This PXF loan reflects the confidence in the speed that both the Seller, turned financier, and the Buyer, believe repayment can be conservatively achieved. No sensible lender or borrower would agree to an aggressive / unrealistic repayment schedule and this lender is the most informed about the assets/repayment ability.
The lender also will have knowledge of the borrower’s oil sales contract with the marketer, which is part of the collateral provided for the financing. This could have a a forward fixed sales component through various mechanisms.