Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
@thorn.
Quote
"More potent warheads' (Dox not quite doing it?)"
He says what he means targeted warheads that currently have horrendous side effects or they are limited.
The very fact that the pipeline is now referred to and tagged as a " drug conjugate"
Other drug companies may want to have their delivery system via PreCision and 6000...
You never know.
Is a sea change and link to ADCs.
At Gen oz.
I think by the placing and the stance Avacta are taking they want to load up and take as much of the business with them.
Proof of dox and more in info at AARC along with trial data and the medical council feedback and not forgetting FDA is about piecing 6000 as a working technology.
I am happy now to sit back and wait. They are in the process of opening up the chemo market.
Holy grail indeed, we hope.
I think an higher low that will be low to high or lower than the high is possible as long as it does rise above the high or low on the low to high chart.
If the trousers are defo low then a bottom will actually be visible - no chart required.
If this trend keeps going then there will need to be a reversal otherwise more than the bottom will appear on the chart.
Pathetic chat and irrelevant now as the ground works have been shelved and all the heart has been removed.
BESS is better.
Historically sub coal pallets would have been a nice thing but apparently the Welsh Moratorium put an end to sub coal plastic pellets.
It is water under the bridge and gone.
Semi agree with Ice but...
The Avacta BOD need to really step up to the plate with regards to what they have got regards data and their plans.
Yes there was info in the placing RNS however I think it is time at some point soon for the BOD to be present in front of the investors to explain what is going on.
If they have more than they planned for in the placing £6m then this should be used to warp drive the the 2 week study and really get bums on seats for the pivotal 2a study.
Also news about Diagnostic division?
I hope every post you reply to gets deleted because you evidently take the negative and then push your narrative.
The trial has changed.
The Avacta positions has also changed as the want to commercialize in 2026.
They are bit by bit taking full control of 6000 with the potential going forward that 3996 will supply more of a runway the other side of the business will also go at some point to give. Straight runway to a commercial product for Avacta.
Timelines always change in clinical trials Wynbore please do some research or if you want to disagree then phone up Thorn he will side with you.
With regards to the 50p placing I ma sure you called it 3 years ago NOT
Https://proteusmr.com/2024/03/12/operational-highlights-retrieval-of-the-ar500-turbine/
Sorry I thought one was a molecule and the other was a protein.
It must be my lack of research.
In summary both bind to molecules with affirmers being far superior in what molecules they combine to and also the genetic makeup of an affirmer.
Https://ore.catapult.org.uk/?orecatapultreports=tidal-stream-technology-roadmap