Member Info for stokey12

This is another article on the implementation of the Procurement Act. https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=f90d2788-0176-48a5-8de8-6c95b6cfaaa6&utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+General+section&utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2024-04-23&utm_term= This one does have relevance for HARL as it relates to Frameworks and Dynamic Markets. These relate to how HARL might get work from public authorites.

Xenor ref 01.31 post I checked the Belfast harbour website after reading your post and the SeaRose is still showing as leaving drydock on 4th July. Perhaps it is going elsewhere before going back to the White Roe oilfield.

Consuela ref 16.11 post can I ask which post did you miss. The original post from Xenor with then link, my two posts draw your attention to xenor's post or all three posts.

Scaffman ref 14.18 post the issue I have with sites like auction match is that they seem to muddying the diference between a public and a private company. When I did Company Law a good few decades ago I was told that you cannot trade a private company on a recognised exchange. This means that once a company delists from a recognised stock exchange and goes private you can not buy or sell shares on a recognised exchange. I am not sure how sites like seedrs and trade match are able to get around this.

Twib ref 11.13 post that is not true they only win on those days of the week that start with a consonant.

Si_Derman ref 09.09 post you ask some very good questions I am not sure what the answer is to any of them. Hopefully we will never have to find out.

Si_Derman ref 08.44 post no but the fact that the expenses of maintaining a listing on AIM is causing companies to delist may be causing issues with liquidity as few investors invest in AIM companies. Also if the rate of delisting continues there is the risk of AIM reaching the de minimis level for AIM to remain viable.

This article from CityAM shows that the issues that HARL may have with regards to its SP seem to be shared with other Ex-AIM companies. https://www.cityam.com/aim-delistings-jump-62-per-cent-as-londons-small-cap-market-suffers/?utm_source=CityAM&utm_campaign=b3ed98e9f9-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2024_04_22_06_17&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_-b3ed98e9f9-%5BLIST_EMAIL_ID%5D

Broomtree ref 11.41 post vesselfinder is showing the destination as VILANOVA_ALGECIRAS due to arrive on 23 April see here for details https://www.vesselfinder.com/vessels/details/9840013

I see that Consuela flasely implied that noone on the board posted a link on the BBC story about the delay in Scilly Ferry going live. Presumably she thought that it was not done because it was not favourable to HARL. When it was pointed out that Xenor had in fact posted the link there was no admission of error. I wonder why it is so hard to admit error.

Final score 88 - 10 with fourteen tries scored. ireland got a penalty try. Two of the England tries were scored when they were down to 14 women. France next week.

The half time score is 38 - 3 to England who only managed 6 tries. It could have been worse with two tries being disallowed. One by Dow was disallowed because it was not grounded. The other was disallowed due to a knock on.

Consuela ref my 13.02 post are you now willing to accept that you were wrong to suggest that nobody provided the link to the BBC story on the delay to the launch of Scilly Ferries?

Consuela ref 13.02 post sorry I was referring to your 12.42 post

Consuela ref 20.51 post actually it was posted by Xenor at 18.35 yesterday.

Xenor ref 09.32 post to quote Francis Urquhart You may think that I cannot comment

This snapshot from Navy Lookout https://www.navylookout.com/snapshot-the-royal-navy-escort-fleet-in-april-2024/ details the state of every ship in the Navy.

Lottie123 ref 07.39 post What I wold be looking to see apart from which decade these new ships will be ordered in is whether they will be ordered from BAB or BAe. As we have seen from the reports in the mediathis week BAe will not prioritise work for the MoD over other clients. We had them saying that one of the much needed Type 26s that they are contractually bound to deliver should be used to fulfil an order for the Norwegian Navy. Also they have said that if they do not have enough forward work they may need to stagger existing work to make sure they do not run out of work. This shows where there loyalties lie. I would like to see HARL being given a fair shake to win the contracts.

LSE03 ref 17.56 post It is much better that he admits to the truth that he is LSE02

LSE03 thanks for this unfortunately it raises almost as many questions as it answers. Chief amongst them is how is this being funded. It says that the HARL (Marine Services) has grown to five freight vessels but when I checked on vesselfinder only the Valonia and the Terramere, which is now approaching Appledore, are showing as HARL vessels. I presume at some stage we will get an update.