RE: SEC Review done and dusted?19 Mar 2026 09:13
On the SEC review / Nasdaq timing — biffa's question
This is the most interesting signal in today's RNS that most retail investors will have missed. The logic is:
The confidential S-4 registration statement was filed with the SEC some time ago. SEC reviews of SPAC registration statements typically take 30 days for initial comments, followed by a response and amendment period. The fact that Mkango has today published highly detailed, financially material information (DFS/PFS results) that would ordinarily form a core part of the S-4 disclosure suggests one of two things:
-The SEC review is sufficiently advanced that this information can now be released publicly without prejudicing the registration process; consistent with biffa's read that the review period is largely done
- Or the DFS/PFS results are being published now to be incorporated into an amended S-4 filing, which would then go back to the SEC for a final review round
FinePrint's concern about confidentiality is valid in theory, the SEC process is designed to prevent selective disclosure that could move markets before the registration is effective. However, as an AIM/TSX-V listed company, Mkango has a parallel regulatory obligation under MAR (Market Abuse Regulation) to disclose inside information promptly. The RNS itself includes a MAR disclosure statement confirming this is inside information now being made public. So Mkango is arguably caught between two regulatory obligations and has chosen to meet its UK MAR duty, which is the correct call.
In summary, biffa's instinct seems reasonable. Publishing this today strongly implies the S-4 process is in its latter stages. If the SEC review were still in early comment-response cycles, you would expect this material to remain confidential. The more optimistic interpretation is that an updated public S-4/proxy filing on EDGAR is now imminent, which would be a significant step toward Nasdaq listing completion.